• DontTreadOnBigfoot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Holy shit.

    I thought this was just going to be a matter of poor security implementation or crappy feature sets.

    Turns out they converted the company into a loan shark operation owned by Chinese ad companies

    when the Opera browser continued losing users (due to competition from Google and Apple), the company shifted gears to building mobile apps that provided predatory short-term loans. The interest rates on those loans ranged from 365-876% per year, and loan terms from 7-29 days.

    • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      This behavior is just beyond batshit. Before anyone decides tl;dr, the article is well worth a read.

      I had a hunch that Opera was circling the drain when I started seeing them sponsor Youtubers. A general rule of thumb is that no company that has anything worth a shit devolves to sponsoring Youtube videos. I had no idea about the predatory loans thing, or the crypto scam chasing thing, or the ripping off ChatGPT thing…

      Back here in reality, there is no reason anyone should be using any other browser than Firefox. There is one organization left in this arena still devoted to protecting privacy, maintaining open standards, and a fair and open web for all. And it ain’t Google, it ain’t Microsoft, and it ain’t Opera.

      • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        And it’s always been Firefox since day one. Out of the ashes of Netscape Navigator rose Firefox and Mozilla have been one of the only bastions of the free and open web ever since. I honestly don’t understand why anyone would use another browser.

          • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 months ago

            Actually it’s an effective cloud-based password manager that doesn’t rely on local storage or weird plugins or backups.

            That’s what keeps me using chrome. I could lose everything in a house fire, pick up any device, log in and have access to all my stuff without any further action on my part, right out of the box.

            That’s the only feature I care about, and chrome is the only browser I’ve seen that provides it.

            Get me that in firefox, and I’ll switch today.

            • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              What are you talking about? Firefox has had literally Sync since before Chrome existed.

              Firefox Sync initial release: December 21, 2007

              Google Chrome intial release: September 2, 2008 (Beta), (1.0) December 11, 2008

              A full year, my guy.

        • Demdaru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Cuz Firefox was for a long time just some shiiiiiiit. It was overloaded, blocky, seemed outdated etc., so ie wasn’t any worse. When chrome came, whooo.

          Now tho, I am simply still prejudiced against it. And I found Edge suits me ideally so I don’t care for any other browser. Until my adblock stops working, then I’ll run.

      • hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I do not agree with your generalisation of YouTube sponsorships, but with the rest I absolutely agree with.

        Honestly, I read something about Opera being vaguely connected to shady Chinese companies right before I started recommending ppl to switch away from Opera or Opera GX. Glad I stuck to that, looks like my intuition did not fail me.

        • dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          You, uh, really feel that the likes of Raid: Shadow Legends, Nord VPN, Honey by PayPal, Raycons, and HelloFresh are really making a positive contribution to the world that we can’t do without?

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I mean, what’s the problem with NordVPN? Pretty much every youtuber I respect who does sponsorship promotes it, and I’ve never heard anything bad about it. Generalizing like that is always bad (or well, mostly always, or ironically I would be generalizing).

      • Engywuck@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        there is no reason anyone should be using any other browser than Firefox.

        Yeah. And everybody should use the same brand of shoes, drive the same model of car, buy at the same store, eat the same food…

        God forbids people having different tastes, opinions and needs.

        There is one organization left in this arena still devoted to protecting privacy, maintaining open standards, and a fair and open web for all. And it ain’t Google, it ain’t Microsoft, and it ain’t Opera.

        Yeah, and it’s not Mozilla either.

        • fernandofig@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Yeah, and it’s not Mozilla either.

          Which one do you think it is, then? Genuinely curious here. I don’t disagree with on most of what you said - I find the simping for Mozilla (and sneering towards chromium) here in Lemmy rather annoying. Mozilla and its browser both have shortcomings as well, and choosing a web browser these days is, as most things in life, choosing the lesser of evils vs. one’s own needs.

          • Engywuck@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Which one do you think it is, then? Genuinely curious here.

            I simply don’t assume that an org/com actually exist which is concerned users’ privacy. Mozilla just follows the money, as any other corp.

            Protecting my privacy is a task I prefer to delegate to mybrain(.org).

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Explain why don’t just clickbait me.

    Man its fucking sad what’s become of Opera. They gave us tabbed browsing, CSS, and lots of other stuff and then just like that, they became another uninteresting Chromium fork and its been straight to the shitter since.

  • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hindenburg is an investment firm that researches publicly-traded companies and shorts their stocks if they find sufficient evidence of investor fraud before releasing its report.

    What a wild business plan. I’m amazed it’s legal.

    • PilferJynx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s kinda scummy to manipulate the market as such, but it’s much more scummy to partake in the fraud.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Short sellers provide benefit to society by finding and shaming doomed businesses so they fail faster and don’t suck up as many resources.

      They also have a proud history of uncovering outright fraud.

      In business, the people complaining loudest about short sellers are emperors with no clothes.

  • lone_faerie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    I knew not to use Opera GX as soon as they started sponsoring youtubers. I swear, youtube sponsorships are like anti-ads. 9 times out of 10 they’re doing something sketchy.

    • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      When I see a product I already use being promoted by YouTubers in sponsored segments, I immediately question if I should be using it, even if I’d have happily continued had I never seen that sponsorship.

      • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Absolutely true. I remember every YouTuber and their mother shilling out for LastPass a few years back. Now that their reputstion is kind of in the dumps after several “noncritical” hacks I see those same YouTubers shilling out for Dashlane.

        It just gets worse if you try to think of any serious sponsorship program by companies that are, to date, trustworthy. There are none because they don’t need them. Word of mouth is good enough for them because the customers they have will stay being customers for a long time. Long enough that they bring in more people just by being happy about the service.

  • alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    PSA: The old Opera guys have a new browser, Vivaldi.

    It’s quite nice and I use it daily.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s a rebranded chromium with some extra bloat. Just like his older brother Chinese Chromium, Opera, and their edgy cousin, Microsoft Chromium. All following the example of Papa Chrome.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yep. I daily drive Vivaldi on both macOS and Android.

      I love it. The sidebar is a great feature; I stash my extension icons there. The theme is highly customizable; I have mine set to something similar to the Opera dark theme.

      I don’t use the email or calendar features. The great thing about Vivaldi is that they provide a ton of power user features, but don’t shove it in your face. It’s super easy to turn off the things you don’t want and to turn on the things you do want.

      I do use UBO, but they also have a builtin ad blocker if you want to use that instead.

      The settings page is very extensive. Tons of customization. True to the Opera legacy!

      • CALIGVLA@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The sidebar is a great feature; I stash my extension icons there.

        That’s amazing, I didn’t know you could do that. I’ve been using Vivaldi since the alpha days and I had no clue you could drag the extensions there.

      • stepanzak@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s what I thought until I installed Firefox with Sidebery and oh man, that’s another level. It required quite a bit of configuration make it really fit my needs, but when you configure it, it’s incredible.

    • milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I keep revisiting Vivaldi once every few months, and get reminded of why I uninstall it within minutes. They remove the option of changing DNS servers from the configuration UI and moved it into flags. I have absolutely no idea why they do that, and its a philosophy I vehemently disagree with.

  • bramblepatchmystery@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    As somebody whose wife just downloaded opera onto the family computer I am horrified.

    She’s been complaining that the internet is slow and has blamed it on protonvon, so has resorted to turning the vpn off when using the internet or discord.

    I remember after Twin Peaks season 3 came out, showtime was stating left and right how profitable the show was, and then accusations started flying that the show was so profitable because showtime was taking over the browser while people were watching and mining bitcoin in the background without telling people they were doing so.

    I trust Opera about a thousand times less just because I had never hears of them until a week or two ago.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Vivaldi has been a better option for those who love the feel of Opera. But Firefox is an overall better package imo

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t want to touch any Chromium-based browser. Firefox all the way.

  • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Opera invested $30 million in the crypto startup ICST that same year, and the startup’s CEO was arrested four days later for financial crimes.

    LOL

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      While inferior to Firefox due to reason outlined by another user, it is infinitely better than going with Chromium-based browsers.

      Keep on using it if you feel comfortable with it

    • tleb@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a developer, Safari is the browser that supports the least standards and is holding the browser ecosystem back.

        • lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          furthermore, they add nonstandard features to their browser(along with chrome), which makes it difficult to make websites look the same across browsers.
          fortunately, I can test those websites beforehand since we have webkit-based epiphany on GNU/Linux(the engine which safari uses).
          but other developers, especially those who are on windows can’t, since safari is mac-only.

          I have a special stylesheet to fix safari(and chrome) styling.
          otherwise it’s a fine lightweight browser(blessed be KHTML).

    • shaked_coffee@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I think there are some better alternatives out there such as Firefox + uBlock Origin extension, Brave, Vivaldi (maybe Arc? Haven’t tried it yet) that gives you some extra features that are missing in safari (for example Multi-account containers, vertical tabs, split tabs,… just to mention the ones I enjoy the most)

      But if you just want a browser that works from a normal usage I don’t see nothing wrong in using Safari.

      +it uses an engine different from Blink (aka Chromium) which keeps a little bit of variety in the browser engine market. So while using Safari you’re also doing something good for the internet imho

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        My biggest attachment to Safari is how well integrated it is with the rest of the Mac. Fingerprint integration for passwords, gesture integration with the track pad, seamless handoff between phone and computer—these things are somewhat reproducible with Firefox and extensions, but it is nowhere near as perfect as it is when you’ve got the browser and the whole OS designed to work in a coordinated dance with each other.

        • shaked_coffee@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Hard to disagree with that… the flawless integration of every piece in Apple’s “ecosystem” is hard to reproduce (even if all those features can be achieved as you were saying, it wouldn’t be “as flawless”) Just maybe pair it with an Ad and Tracker blocker extension like AdGuard

    • Haha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just for the bullshit with the video players i would never use safari.

  • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    They did some awesome browsers back in the early 2000s. I couldn’t think about browsing the web without Opera Mini back then.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And despite being designed to run on potatoes with a 2G connection it somehow felt just as smooth as modern mobile browsers (at least as I remember it). It’s crazy how well it worked considering the hardware and network limitations of the time.

      • Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Didn’t opera cache images on their server and feed you a lower res version instead of what the website had? Granted with the limited bandwidth available back then, that was fine but now I don’t think many people would want that.

        • privatizetwiddle@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          In Opera Mini, yes. They also had a less popular but nearly identical browser, Opera Mobile, which didn’t do the proxying and compression. I had an unlimited data plan back then, so I always used Mobile. The performance was great even without compression.

        • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Exactly this. Lower resolution and added compression. You could click to view full version if needed, but this was a feature as it meant faster loading and a small fraction of the data usage.