Archived copies of the article:

The key thing here is that the less overshoot the better, and the amount of overshoot we can afford is small.

  • collapse_already@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 days ago

    No one with any political power is even remotely trying to prevent that. Maybe we can have a huge war that kills billions to slow the rate of ascent. It is the most likely path that actually results in a timely emissions reduction that is politically tenable (see Iran v. Israel and Pakistan v. India for potential starting points, Ukraine v. Russia could escalate too, I suppose).

    More likely, the climate will start killing us in greater quantities (famines, floods, hurricanes, droughts) resulting in an emission reduction. Eventually, it is a self correcting problem, but that most likely outcome maximizes suffering.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Xi seems to be putting China on a decarbonization trajectory. Not as fast as we need, but one that’s meaningful

    • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 days ago

      Well Iran vs Israel is already happening and escalating into probably a forever war but I doubt war will help climate change War itself also causes a fuck ton of emissions and environmental damage