• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    the defendant was trying to scam the company.

    No, that’s a lie. Monsanto may have characterized it as “scamming,” but I don’t give a fuck about monopolists’ opinions and neither should anybody else.

    Even intentionally preferentially gathering and replanting “Monsanto’s” “patented” seeds is not wrong, end of!

    • IMongoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      These are public court cases, Monsanto isn’t characterizing anything. The ones I’ve seen are deliberate attempts to use the seeds without paying. Do you have examples of a farmers livelihood destroyed by Monsanto? Because it doesn’t seem good business to me for them to attack random farmers. I implore you to look at the link I posted or google it yourself.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        The ones I’ve seen are deliberate attempts to use the seeds without paying.

        Yes, I know. Re-read my last sentence.