Sure why not? Add to the delicious medley of microplastics and persistent organic pollutants, what could go wrong!

  • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is such a beautiful piece of news. Beautiful the way a hurricane is beautiful. Such a perfect combination of everything wrong

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. Contaminating food with semiconductors (especially food that’s expected to be heated to very high temperatures in some dishes, perfect for breaking down already non-edible chemicals into even more reactive pollutants and then actively drawing them out of the semiconductor to where it’s more readily absorbed by the intestines.) Look up some of the chemicals used to create the semiconductor effect in silicon. Arsenic is a really common one. It’s locked away in the silicon crystal and harmless when outside your body, but inside your body when exposed to the heat of cooking and then strong acid in your stomach, who knows?!

      2. Making your own product worse to own the counterfeiters. One of the biggest reasons for avoiding counterfeit food is the higher risk of contaminants, well now that the genuine product is contaminated what’s the goddamn point?

      3. Probably not preventing counterfeiters as in “they’re selling a block of flour and passing it off as cheese”, because you don’t need a chip to detect that. More like “it didn’t come from this very specific region in Italy by the established cheese monopoly, but it’s pretty much identical otherwise.” Protecting the brand and its profitability, not the consumer.

      4. Literal fucking food DRM. Remember when this used to be satire?

      • senoro@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The chip is in the rind which you don’t eat. And the chip is food safe anyway, if someone was to eat the rind.