• Pyro@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have no respect for people shoplifting non-essential items (like makeup, etc) but essential items like food is a different story.

    • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      In my opinion it depends more on whom you are stealing from than what. Food is okay, anything else not absolutely required for immediate survival isn’t is a somewhat cruel and arbitrary position.

      Even a dirt poor person has more needs than just food sometimes, to stick with your example even a dirt poor woman or girl may want to feel pretty for a moment, and I feel that’s nothing bad either. Granted this is a slippery slope to outright lawlessness, but there certainly is a lot of room for valid needs that are less immediate than nourishment and shelter, but still important to people feeling human at all. Counts twice for people already in the extremely dehumanizing position of being poor.

      • can@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        She may need it for an interview to improve her prospects too. As long as it’s from a big place like Walmart I see no harm in someone desperate doing it to improve their situation.

        The Walton family will be fine.

      • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        My policy has become: “If you see someone shoplifting, no you didn’t.” All businesses write a little bit of theft loss into their budgets. I don’t care what shoplifters take. It’s not my concern. Let the egg heads in accounting and the beef sticks in loss prevention figure it out. That’s what they’re paid to do. Not you.

        • AmberPrince@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Mines a bit different, but similar. “If you see someone shoplifting, no you didn’t” only applies to chain stores. Walmart? Fuck 'em. Target? Get all you can. Local boutique store downtown? The fuck is wrong with you, go steal from a corporation that deserves it.

        • DillyDaily@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          They don’t get jobs as flight attendants. If you already work in an industry that mandates make up use, and you’re doing it tough, shoplifting make up seems like a smarter financial choice than getting fired over a lack of make up and having to find work in an entirely new industry.

          As someone who currently doesn’t even own a single article of make up (unless you count tinted zinc), yes, you can get by without it, but not everyone can, and loosing your job over other when you’re already struggling financially isn’t ideal.

    • thearch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      (legitimate question) why don’t people in need use food availability programs like food stamps instead of stealing for essentials?

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        when you have children to feed and you’re hungry yourself - standing in line to fill in a form and wait an interderminate amount of time to be potentially denied something that comes with a huge amount of restrictions it’s just easier to steal.

        There is enough food and wealth to feed and home everyone. Theft is a service issue.