• squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Uh, no. It’s a statement about the ability to modify property and laws relating to that. Not sure who brought up murder.

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s a statement comparing 2 objects that are forbidden to modify. Guns are forbidden due to their ability to kill even more people through modification, video game systems are forbidden due to their ability to hurt company profits through piracy.

      People are pointing out the huge moral difference between the bases for those two similar rules, and how one cannot compare them fairly as being equivalent unless they also believe those bases are equivalent.

      • flynnguy@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s not illegal to modify a gun, it’s illegal to modify a gun into a gun that meets certain criteria to then become illegal. The crime isn’t modification of the gun, the crime is the possession of a (now) illegal gun.

        • Signtist@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          So it’s… forbidden to modify it into something that kills even more people. There’s a reason I didn’t use the word “illegal.”