If he called “no homo” before he sucked the dick then it doesn’t count.
The Brojob Defense.
We’re they wearing socks? With socks on its not gay at all.
Wait… I thought you were supposed to say that after the fact not before…
Brb, I have some calls to make.
Oh no, you see he was just passing by when he noticed that the farmworker was possessed and he decided to perform an impromptu exorcism.
It’s like a snakebite. He’s sucking the demon seed out.
is that how that works?
I should get possessed more often.
I can help you, step bro.
Oh really? Would you say you would sell your soul for it?
̶̡͕͙͈̙͛J̵̡̛̰̙̪̙u̴̠̟̘̎̓s̶̪͐͜t̴̡̞̳̓̔̿̒ ̴̗̹̖̰̎͛ş̷̗̈́́i̵͛̎̌͗͘͜g̸̤̳̲̪̮͐̑̑͒̍n̷͚͆ ̸̻͌̂h̶͖̠̗̾̈́͆͜e̸͖̻͛r̷̨̢̾̈̅͝͝ě̶̡̫͉̟͉́̐̑͠ ⛧
I mean I guess he supports farm workers…
Schmidt had been charged with a felony for choking another worker on his farm, but had pleaded it down to a misdemeanor Source
Despite the controversies and the write-in campaign, the district’s heavy Republican tilt, created by Wisconsin’s strong Republican gerrymander, allowed Schmidt to easily prevail in the general election with 55% of the vote.
^Yaaay democracy…
It’s an oral tradition.
Yeah, but these subsidies are starting to get out of hand…
Government handies!
Out of hand and into mouth, even!
Say what you will about Republicans, but at least this guy and Lauren Boebert are willing to roll up their sleeves and get their hands dirty.
Did their hands get dirty? Or did they just swallow?
I wonder how many conservatives would be liveral if they received some good therapy.
I am always feeling liveral after my latest transplant.
Why do you think they do their best to restrict access to mental healthcare?
That cock sucking
motherfather fucker!!!So the tape came out after he won the primary but before the election. The GOP tried to push a write in campaign for his primary opponent. Some said they’d vote for the dem candidate. But due to republican gerrymandering, the sucker still won.
You misspelled “erection”
‘the sucker’, I see what you did there ;-)
It is Mr Suck for you
Nah that wasn’t due to gerrymandering, or no more than any other election at least. That was due by the fact that Republican voters will vote for the the party no matter what. He could have been having a bukake party at the parking lot and they still would have voted for.
that wasn’t due to gerrymandering,
That was due by the fact that Republican voters will vote for the the party no matter what
And gerrymandering works by the politicians choosing their voters rather than the other way around.
In this case by artificially making sure that there’s enough “GOP no matter what” voters in the district to guarantee a Republican victory.
Well, at least he practices brotherly love …
I hate stories like this because it makes it seem like there’s something wrong with being gay.
I get that we’re supposed to dislike this guy because he’s a hypocrite, but that’s not what is written. What’s written is “giving a blow job”.
Am I just being I over-sensitive here?
Yes, you’re being overly sensitive here.
The negative thing on display isn’t the blowjob, it’s the harm he causes to others while himself engaging in the very acts he attacks.
If some idiot spent his life trying to make rollercoasters illegal, and then was photographed on a roller coaster have a great time, what moral value would you give to “Anti-coaster polician caught on video riding coaster.”
The headline is highlighting that the guy is a hypocrite. If it just said “Politician is a Hypocrite.” Basically everyone would be like "wtf is this article is about? How is he a hypocrite? Who wrote this uninformative headline?
I think I’m thinking “lefties don’t like him already; it doesn’t matter if he gave a BJ or not, it doesn’t matter if he’s a hypocrite or not. Right-wingers will see the headline and their takeaway will be ‘gross, he’s gay’ and the hypocrisy will be of minor importance.”
So I think your rollercoasters example is not the same in my mind. But maybe it is the same and I’m just being weird about this. Most people seem to think so from the answers I’ve had :)
You aren’t wrong that a small minority of people will see that line and think 'eww gross" and while that’s shitty in principle, it’s a reader problem, not a headline problem.
Yes.
The shaming part is that he is gay / bi and is using his power to erase / subjugate the LGBTQ groups
He’s a fucking hypocrite
People seem to have weirdly missed that the person he sexually assaulted was an employee of his farm. Would you like your job to depend on receiving your boss’ secret blowjobs? (Quit answering yes you fucking perverts!)
He isn’t just a hypocrit, like all
Republicanspoliticiansrich people he abuses his power to extract whatever demeaning things he wants from other people, starting with their underpriced labor and apparently moving on to also extracting their seed directly as well.Unless you have information that isn’t in this tweet, it doesn’t say that it’s not consensual or that his workers are underpaid.
The power dynamic in this ‘relationship’ is definitely icky but not necessarily sexual assault
I didn’t even think about him being gay, or connote it with being gay.
No, there is something wrong with being a hypocrite
you are completely misrepresenting the story… the entire point is that he is a hypocrite, the fact that he is a hypocrite about being gay is completely irrelevant
It’s like you missed the context completely. What is also written is “who opposes LGBT”
I don’t know, without the religious fruitcake stuff he sounds like a cool dude.
I will take the hot take devil’s advocate position, and mostly agree with this. I’m not sure it really does too much to call out these clowns for their hypocrisy, other than make everyone sort of, feel better about their own preconcieved political dispositions, and dunk on a homophobe. The people who support these freaks are operating on a different sort of framework. Often it’s not straight up denialism as much as it is like, some sort of idiotic conception about the fall of western culture, or about god punishing the wicked from some shit that’s stupidly cited in leviticus, or paul being an asexual rapture doomer.
I think the only way that this is really like, blown, bu dum tsss, blown up into a larger issue, right, at least, for libs, rather than being like, a one-off easy dunk case, is if we maybe extrapolate that all, or a large portion, of these homophobic crusaders is also just super closeted gay dudes. I don’t know whether or not that’s the case, like disproportionately, right, but I think it’s probably not good to sort of, operate on that assumption, or extrapolate this to be the case, based on these kinds of incidents. I dunno, guys, he could be bisexual, he could be bi. This would be typical bisexual behavior, honestly. And, is it gay to be bisexual, fellas?
In any case, I mostly hate this dude more for the fact that he’s a homophobic shitbag, more than the fact that he’s giving someone a blowie. The blowie is probably his best quality, I would say. You think his head game is strong, or not? Be honest now, I don’t wanna hear that his political views prevent him from giving good head, if that were the case then bipolar sacred geometry crystal girlfriends would be out of business.
I think so. It’s the double standards and the gross hypocrisy that make the story.
It just to show the hipocrisy. Republicans oppose everything homosexual but at the sane time show that it is something some still partake in. If anything, it shows that being a republican is hiding yourself. Giving a blowjob to men is what he opposes, but what he apparently enjoys. The blowjob itself is not the subject of the post.
I think pointing out the hypocrisy of these people is good overall. I don’t think it is saying being gay and giving blow jobs as a man is bad. It is saying someone that is opposing the rights of gay people getting caught having some sort of gay sexual acts shows how ridiculous it is to be against the rights of others to be gay.
I mean, the power dynamic here of having sexy times with your employee isn’t great either.
If an avowed homophobe turns out to be gay, they should absolutely be called out for their hypocrisy.
Yes. It’s pointing out the hypocrisy of the oxygen theif.
Is this real?
Straight off Wikipedia
Days after the primary, it was revealed that Schmidt had been the victim of a blackmail attempt by a worker on his family farm, who had a video of Schmidt performing oral sex on another man.[3] The same week, another story came to light in which Schmidt had been charged with a felony for choking another worker on his farm, but had pleaded it down to a misdemeanor.[4]
Choking his chicken maybe.
Boom. Roasted.
Roasted chicken maybe.
Yes, but it’s fairly old.
or is this just fantasy
Caught in a cock slide
No escape from hypocrisy
Open your mouth
Look up at this guy and see…
Open your eyes, look up to the skies and see I’m just a poor boy, I need no sympathy
I’m more concerned if the worker had a chance to shower before receiving it. Imagine the funk if he had been working the farm all day and hadn’t.
Maybe that’s his thing.
Remember folks: while the Right wing of American politics actively tries to distract you with culture war nonsense, the topics they choose for their culture war are chosen from their own personal closet of skeletons.
Where is the video?
Why no link 🔗 to video?
Because this is literally fake news or propaganda to show how easy it is for people to lap up bullshit without sources from a tweet probably…
Rightwingers really aren’t worth the oxygen they consume, huh?
Stealing our air.
I mean, if their only solution to climate change is malthusianism; they’re free to martyr themselves.
The GOP candidate said that the video came from “a brief moment I struggled with my sexuality.”
My man…
Yeah, their citation leads to nothing. I cannot find the video either.
It just links to Wispolitics.com. It’s also the source on Wikipedia. I can’t find any blowies either.
Smells like Republican bullshit to me.
I mean, if the news was so widespread that it got on Wikipedia I think he would’ve sued if it was false. An LGBTQ site putting words in their mouth seems a prime candidate for an easy defamation lawsuit.
Watch for Wiki edits now, because I could find nothing to corroborate the story
Probably because it’s considered revenge porn. Legality is a concern there regardless of who’s on the other end.
But its not revenge porn, its whistle blowing. Let the people watch!
He won his election by the way
He Who Giveth Head Shall Be Greatly Rewarded.
John 42:69
Trump Bible Edition
Despite Republican Party opposition and a write-in campaign - but because gerrymandering it was a cinch for him to win
it was a cinch for him to win
Come on dude…
- His win was a blow out.
- Even though he sucked as a politician, he won easily
- he handily beat his opposition
- he sucked away the energy from his opponent
cinch /sĭnch/
noun
-
A girth for a pack or saddle.
-
An encircling cord, band, or belt.
-
Something easy to accomplish. synonym: breeze.
-
A sure thing; a certainty.
“Their team is a cinch to win the tournament.”
-
Stories like this are very upsetting, all these republican religious nuts out there sucking cock and going to gay orgies. I might have to convert.
Yeah but they have to fuck republicans. Anarchists have gay orgies too, we just do affordable drugs at them
I can only imagine how bad a Republican orgy would be. Not enough lube, no dental dams, no wet wipes, just one set of sheets for each bed, bad lighting, terrible music.
No thank you.
Affordable drugs? Like caffeine?
Like homegrown cannabis, bottom shelf booze, or homegrown hallucinogens
Bottom shelf booze
No homebrew?
Homebrew is always acceptable. I just haven’t had real moonshine since I lived in Kentucky. And miss me with that mass produced moonshine. Also none of my friends have the room to brew beer, but the wife and I would love to try sometime, and it would be amazing to serve at a gay orgy.
When I have a yard I want to grow fruit to start vinting.