• Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    TPM is a joke in my mind

    I thought this at first as well, but they have an interesting property.

    They have a manufacturer signed private key. If you get the public key from the manufacturer of the TPM, you can actually verify that the TPM as it was designed by the manufacturer performed the work.

    That’s a really interesting property because for the first time there’s a way to verify what hardware is doing over the network via cryptography.

    • andyburke@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Or, if I can extract that key from the hardware, I can pretend to be that hardware whenever I want, right?

      • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Hmmm… I was going to say no because it’s asymmetric crypto, but you’re right if you are somehow able to extract the signed private key, you can still lie… Good point

        • yggstyle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Got some bad news. They already can do that. It’s a very low effort attack too. Current TPM spits its key out in clear text. Funny right?