• oce 🐆@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Better track record to avoid rich people, but not to allow general population quality of life and prevention of an authoritarian government. I’ll take European social democracy and its rich people over it.

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      in general the soviet union (and china for that matter) has been on the vanguard of quality of life for the common people. even vietnam is doing much better than east asians in general.

      most of the good workers rights you see in europe came first for the soviets.

      the problem with social democracy is that it doesnt address the rich people and they take it right back over time, as you can see in the US for example.

      most of the socialist countries are democratic rn.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Not all left ideas come from the Soviet or communist China although they participated to the experiments. Most socialist parties in EU split from USSR and communist China from the revolutions or when the economical catastrophes (Chinese famines) or atrocities (military repression of opposition and gulags) they committed were revealed. From then, it split between social democrats and communists, social democrats are simply called socialists in those countries (at least France and Spain).
        Apart from Sanders, I think American democrats are very far from European social democrats, they rather correspond to our traditional right, which indeed doesn’t care much about rising inequalities. I think the median people live better in European social democrat countries than they ever did in communist countries.