• Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        We’ll you see the virus has just struggle through the fibers. It’s all very obvious you just have to engage in idiot thought processes.

        You know, not to belittle anyone or anything. I would hate the moronic idiots to think I was making fun of them.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Catching water particles, which carries the virus.

      N95 masks do a really good job (something like 80% reduction in transmission), but most people wear those typical surgical masks (or worse, a single-layer cloth mask with almost no protection) that merely reduces transmission by something like half. If you’re wearing a mask the whole day, it’ll get saturated and become far less effective. So, 50% fewer particles best case (average for a full day is likely way worse) doesn’t sound like a good tradeoff to me.

      That said, if I’m going to an area with at-risk people, I’ll use the best mask available while I’m there. But for all-day usage, no, it’s not going to be that effective on net.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        something like 80% reduction in transmission

        reduces transmission by something like half

        so it slows the spread by…preventing transmission of the virus

        fucking fabulous job, my dude

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          It doesn’t prevent transmission, it reduces transmission. You’ll have similar total numbers of infected people, it just flattens the curve so people get sick slower.

          I totally agree that wearing masks has its place, but it’s not going to meaningfully reduce the spread, it’s already endemic so you’re likely going to get it regardless.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            not going to meaningfully reduce the spread

            merely reduces transmission by something like half

            What definition are you using for “meaningfully”?

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              As in, move toward eradication/containment.

              That’s just… not happening. So if there’s a big wave of COVID, you could delay getting it toward the end of the wave, but you’ll probably get it. If you’re vaxxed and boosted (and I am), symptoms will probably be lessened, but you’ll probably still get it. Just like the common cold or the flu, you’ll probably get it every year or two regardless of what you do (outside of total quarantine).

              The good news is that it seems to be getting more mild, or at least that’s my anecdotal experience. I first got COVID just before vaccines were available for my age bracket (I think spring of 2021), and I had a crazy fever, hacking cough, and body soreness and was essentially confined to my bed for two days, and had really nasty phlegm for weeks afterward. The second time was fall 2023 (got sick the last day of a cruise), and I felt dizzy (probably from the boat), mild to moderate fever, headache, runny nose, and low energy, but otherwise generally able to get around, and symptoms were largely gone within a week. Part of that is that I had the vaccine and previous natural immunity, but it was a completely different strain with different symptoms. I’ve heard similar things from co-workers and friends in my area (each had the 2020/2021 strain and then whatever went around last year).

              It makes sense to take precautions when sick, around those who are sick, and when cases spike, but that’s mostly to slow the spread to help out hospitals, but that also likely means it sticks around longer (i.e. instead of running out of steam in 2 months, it’ll run for 6 months). So wearing masks everyday makes little sense unless you work in a cancer ward or something.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                Really seems like a 50-80% is meaningful, but for whatever reason you’re tying yourself in knots trying to justify not liking wearing a mask.

                It’s like saying there’s no point in stopping smoking when you’ve been diagnosed with lung cancer because there’s ONLY a 30-40% risk reduction of dying. Or maybe refusing to wash your hands because every cold or flu you’ve gotten has been ‘not that bad’. Except in this case, the risk reduction is for everyone around you instead of just yourself.

                Like, whatever you want to do bud, but you’re not convincing anyone that basic hygiene while you’re sick isn’t beneficial.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Sure, 50-80% would be great if that’s the average case. But it’s not, that’s the best case, and apples if the mask:

                  • is fresh
                  • fits properly
                  • is high quality

                  But if you’re wearing a mask all day, it’s not going to be fresh, will likely not fit properly the whole time, and probably not be very high quality. Most of the masks I saw at the height of COVID were crappy single-layer cloth masks with effectiveness in the single digits.

                  So your average mask is probably 5-25% effective on net if worn all day.

                  That’s why I say we shouldn’t be wearing masks all day, we should only wear them when it’s important. That way, people are more likely to use a fresh mask and ensure it fits properly. I can put up with wearing a high quality mask for a few hours or days, but if you ask me to do that every single day, I’m going to get lazy, and lazy reduces effectiveness.

                  At the height of COVID, medical experts wanted to slow the spread to preserve hospital capacity, so even single digit effectiveness was fine. But these days, there’s not much point to such low numbers of effectiveness, so mask-wearing shouldn’t be an everyday thing, but instead something you do when it’s especially important. Make it a normal thing, just not a routine.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Sure, washing your hands reduces risk of infection by 16-20%, but that’s best case, and applies only when:

                    • You wash for at least 30 seconds
                    • You wash with the right kind of soap
                    • You do it after you use the bathroom and not before

                    So really it’s probably 5-10% effective on average. That’s why i say we shouldn’t wash our hands all the time, only when you’ve actually touched shit."

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I’m absolutely pro-vaccines. I get every vaccine that’s available. I’m not sure what your point is, I agree that being anti-vaccine is stupid.