• HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    8 months ago

    Under very, very limited circumstances, maybe. Like you need gas to get to work now, get paid tomorrow, and have nothing in your account? Yeah, maybe, but that’s an expensive tank of gas for someone that’s that short on cash.

    OTOH, I can’t count the number of times where my former bank processed my paycheck last–even though it went in first–and then hit me with overdraft fees for buying groceries, gas, paying bills, etc. (This was National City Bank; they ended up losing a class action lawsuit about it, but they still made more money from their theft than they had to pay back out.)

    IMO, there should be zero overdraft fees; if the money isn’t in your account, the charge is declined. All of this shit should be done in real-time, instead of waiting for a merchant to post at the end of the day. This is the twenty-fucking-second century, and it’s not that goddamn hard.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Or even better, make banks immediately start treating any negative balance as a credit. There can be a low limit, but enforce a low interest rate. For all that banks have done to us, I feel like this is literally the least they can do—and shit, they’d still turn more profit.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is actually not a terrible idea. Though interest rates in general need to be capped on lines of credit of all varieties. The fact that 45% interest on a credit card is not being brought up on usury charges is insane.

      • jigsaw250@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        What’s funny is that it looked odd when I read it, but I just quickly brushed it off as a “well you don’t see it written often.”