• CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What you’re saying here doesn’t make any sense. What you said previously made sense but lacked nuance or any deeper understanding of the situation you proposed yourself.

      Perhaps you think blatant, ignorant bigotry and “testing freedom of speech” are the same thing, which explains your response, and shows you the reasoning behind mine.

      • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh boy. No, I don’t think they are the “same thing” I’m saying you can’t infer motivation just by observing therefore the motivation isn’t relevant. Try and keep up, or don’t.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re discussing the law and being arrested. Intent absolutely matters in this context which is why I brought up other examples of where intent matters as murder/manslaughter, hate crimes, assault versus self defense, etc. You seem quite confused about a topic that you brought up on your own…

          • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re not thinking clearly. Intent is irrelevant, it can’t be known in this example. Got it?

            Just in case, here it is again. Intent is irrelevant.