• lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hunt you? No. Tell whoever is hunting you the best thing they can use as bait to draw you out in the open? Yes.

  • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It seems egotistical to think an AI would consider hunting you sufficiently challenging to be called “sport”. I expect to be swatted like a bug.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I would’ve thought the AI could have come up with a better logo than a blue circle

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Honestly it does make sense.

      A circle is a familiar shape reminiscent of a face and can be given mouth like animations, it provides a center for your eyes to focus where there would otherwise be a person.

      Because face it, if they used anything remotely resembling a human the uncanny valley would deter most from using it.

      • bstix@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        So lemme get this straight: It has to look like a face, but can’t look like a face, so circle.

        Nah, I don’t buy it.

        If they can’t make an AI that appears more trustworthy, I’d rather argue with the Microsoft paperclip.

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    If anyone’s interested it’s pretty good, out performs gpt3.5 (the free one) and has some cool multimodsl capabilities.

    Meta open sourced it like they do with most their ai stuff so anyone can run it locally free of tracking concerns or other limitations.

    I know meta is the popular evil at the moment but they’ve done something good.