Some 30 female police officers in Sweden allowed themselves to be seduced and exploited by gangsters to whom they gave information that later led to several deadly altercations on the streets.

  • WallEx@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t get what you’re saying, that doesn’t look like this source is not credible.

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That definitely suggests this source is not credible, but you read what you want to read, old bean

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      The source is full of red flags all over, and it’s not reputable at all. Having a fancy header is not the same as “looking credible”.

      They cite two sources. One is behind a paywall in Swedish, the other is a politician they choose to label as conservative, but who is actually member of the Swedish extreme right (Sverigedemokraterna), not the conservative party (Moderaterna).

      • WallEx@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was looking at the link provided, as this person provided that as evidence. On that site there is not really anything leading me to believe everything from them is bs.

        • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          The link shows that mediabiasfactcheck has never heard of them, they’re not listed at all.

          Perhaps, just maybe, that’s why there’s nothing leading you to believe that 😂

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Citing a paywalled source isn’t really non-credible. DN is absolutely a credible source. But for anyone that’s doesn’t have a DN sub, read the SVT article like someone else suggested. The Euronews article is probably good too.

        But personally I would probably dismiss any newspaper with such a stupid name.

        Here is the DN article for anyone that’s interested (copy pasted using Firefox reader, so pardon my formatting): https://paste.ee/p/4MIBi

        Here is part two that was published the next day: https://paste.ee/p/mBhgt

        • aasatru@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah, it’s not that DN is not reputable, it’s just that I couldn’t actually check that they made the same claims as Conservative European. When I checked SVT it said something different, which didn’t increase my confidence either.

    • Eheran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      These sources are generally trustworthy for information but may require further investigation.