• neidu3@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’m not saying Donald is a russian asset… But what more could daddy vladdy wish for?

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    As predicted years ago.

    Trump is Putin’s ally, not NATO’s.

    This was forseen by some YEARS ago…

    As I’ve said before, they’re committed to destroying all the “woke” countries in a pincer between Putin & Trump,

    & that’s why Greenland is required, so the US can do to Canada what Russia’s been doing to Ukraine, & once Canada’s destroyed, then the hated-by-them-both EU can be destroyed.

    It’s a strategy, & it will succeed unless the TrueNATO countries SMARTEN UP SHARPLY, QUICKLY, which looks to not be going to happen…

    Whatever.

    There are other worlds in endless-stream-of-universes: our continuums/souls will just do it again, on another world, after obliterating this “Garden of Eden” world, right?

    whatever.

    Watching humankind “prevent” snuffing-of-humankind is like watching a junkie’s life be obliterated by whatever junk they’re addicted-to.

    Inevitable, depressing, pointless…

    Oh, sure, it’s possible that the addict in question might somehow change & fight-for-their-life against their unconscious-mind’s obliteration-addiction, but is it likely?

    not.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is literally the behavior of a traitor

    Seriously, what happened USA? You were never the best, not even close, you were one of the worst, but st least you tried. Now you just kinda dropped pretence and went full asshole

    • P1k1e@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 days ago

      And only 6 months into one administration. Honestly I’ve never seen politicians work so fast at anything

      • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 days ago

        4 years followed by 4 years of biden where republicans blocked almost everything but he is now a perfect puppet to blame for everything and now the next 6 months. But Trump already started to refill positions back then.

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    4 days ago

    Yup. Doing Putin’s work. So you’re going to withrdraw from an even more powerful alliance right in the middle of an arms race. Fucking genius strategery right there.

    • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      they’re doing it very knowingly… they wrote an entire nearly 1000 page fucking document detailing exactly what they’re doing in excruciating detail.

      the fascists == idiots trope needs to go bc that’s exactly what makes them dangerous. lots of these fuckers are quite intelligent and conniving. you should be weary.

      • Rose@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        4 days ago

        Oh yeah, they have a plan all right.

        Now, the plan isn’t any good and everyone gets screwed, even them.

        But it is, technically speaking, a plan!

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 days ago

        the fascists == idiots trope needs to go bc that’s exactly what makes them dangerous.

        That plan doesn’t work. It assumes that the rest of the world just sits back and takes their crap lying down which isn’t happening. They genuinely think they can just take over Greenland and nothing would happen. I don’t know if they’re intelligent or not, but they’re definitely delusional.

        • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          They’ve handily proven time and time again in recent memory how they can in fact just do things and the rest of the world will sit back and take it lying down, though. That’s the problem. Anyone who thinks it’s just an America issue or something like that grievously misunderstands the tenuous house of cards that the pax americana and era of modern peace is built upon. Realistically, how far are you willing to go to prevent fascism? Would you die for it? Would you crawl through the trenches in a land many seas away from home? Some people might say yes but realistically most Westerners and others would never dare give up their creature comforts. It’s not delusional to think the world can change in the way they suggest precisely because they’ve suggested it - that is the hallmark of the fascist movement and what ties their collective ethos together, a philosophy of domination in all aspects.

          Idk in short, I agree that yeah these people are certainly morally bankrupt. Lots of them are delusional. Any group of people has some like that. That doesn’t mean we should strawman them. There’s lots of idiots and they might think the US could invade Greenland without causing an international crisis. Either fortunately or unfortunately, these aren’t the people saying that the US wants to own Greenland or that we should go to war with Iran, for example.

          The people who control and run this movement are not delusional. They’re dangerous.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        you should be weary.

        Oh don’t worry, we’re really freaking tired and weary of this nonsense.

        But we should also be wary of how sneaky these bastards are.

        • jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          i made the freudian slip originally before publishing the comment but decided to keep it in because it felt apt. lol

      • zqps@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The followers of fascist movements are alsolute morons. The leaders are ruthless and capable opportunists.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Just when I warmed up to the idea that NATO was a necessary evil to counter Putin’s worse evil.

      • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        It is but losing the traitor in the assembly is not a bad thing. Now if Europe could jailbreak all that American tech they have in their military gear too, that would be nice.

      • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It also is a necessity to keep the USA from going Putin… Trump wouldn’t stop wanting to be a King. As a King he’d work on becoming the Emperor. As Caesar Donald the step to becoming the god emperor isn’t that big…

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          As Caesar Donald the step to becoming the god emperor isn’t that big…

          Kinda just hoping we can skip all that and go straight to the “Et tu, Bruté?” bit.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Between this and USAID I can’t say I’m unhappy about it. Of course dismantling imperialism is a good thing, but I also don’t understand. The republicans should be all about illegal invasions, bombing civilians, and installing puppet dictators, so they should love USAID and NATO, yet here we are. Is this just incompetence?

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    From a Turkish perspective, it’s fucking ridiculous for Trump to first convince us to increase the defense budget, then withdraw from the alliance completely. The fuck is his goal?

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Incredible to observe the rapid (self)destruction of US. I’m just waiting for a couple of states to declare independence. Within a 5-10 years USA will be history like the Sovjet Union; it will break down into smaller countries.

  • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    4 days ago

    That’s fine, just pack your shit and close all military bases in nato countries as well.

    • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      4 days ago

      Hey, you know how much money they spend on having this bases? Some regions depend on it.

      On the other hand… I think Trump and his mad posse wouldn’t risc being such bigmouths without their Bases in Turkey or Ramstein.

      Also their level of megalomanic moronity makes me fear that when the USA leaves Nato it would start attacking the rest of the world. Canada and Mexico first. Then they would find “justifications” to raid through middle america and “bring idiocrazy” to south america. Reinstating slavery for everyone that ain’t “a good godfearing white patriot”… Because… the white race is superiour and needs Lebensraum… Oh god, I’ve heard that shit all over in history class when I grew up in Germany in the 1970ies…

      Please, anyone stop them now!!!

      • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I remember german history class aswell, it might get ugly history seems to repeat itself a lot.

        • Xande@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Yes, why do people never learn from history… Especially when it endangers their lives

          Damnit I remember the frogging digits of the telefonnumber we had in out flat from where we lived until 1980!

      • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        We should wait for them to start a war with someone like Canada, and THEN ambush them. But to do that, Russia needs to be overrun.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    US: “NATO members need to up their defense spending!”

    NATO: “Okay, we’ll do it.”

    US: “Actually, We’re leaving NATO.” 🤡

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’m pretty sure that last decade or so has shown that Europe doesn’t spend enough. It’s not just Russia’s invasion. Military action in Libya was reliant on the US to sustain more than a few days of action.

  • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    300
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Look how stupid your country is, to hand the death of NATO to Putin because you’re on his side.

    Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

    Fuck you.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      137
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      We’re pretty pissed off at ourselves right now too. I’m sorry things got this far and wish I could offer more than fear and frustration…

        • derek@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          69
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I keep seeing this sentiment and I don’t understand it. Are you speaking purely out of anger and ignorance? The recent No Kings protest was either the third or first largest protest in the history of the U.S.A. and some communities have literally been running ICE gestapo out of their towns.

          The Christian Conservative minority have gridlocked the American government, silently stacked the judicial system in their favor, and partnered with the American oligarchy to bankroll fascists and create the most pervasive, effective, and enduring propaganda machines ever seen (that’s already worked its way into Australia and had been finding footholds in Europe).

          The idea that Americans aren’t doing anything about this or that there could ever possibly be a single unified movement that magically fixes “the issue” is incoherently reductive and impractical. If I see a comrade struggling for air I don’t yell at them to just breathe. I help them remove the pig standing on their neck. What are YOU doing to lend a hand or show lost comrades that there’s still hope?

          • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            60
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            It really sounds like you cowards are holding REALLY tightly to the same talking points- so fucking desperate not to face your inadequacy and complete lack of spine. It’s gross, honestly.

            Guess what, you’re not “one of the good ones.”

            • AizawaC47@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              5 days ago

              My word Brotha… just breathe. I know you darn good well if you really, really look deep in the center of it all. I mean like seriously look deep, you and I know who really is at fault. Is it really the common folks and citizens of America? Is it really those individuals who make barely enough to get a meal on their desk, because most of the paycheck goes to rent, house payments, bills and the unnecessary bs insurances? Bro the inflation is so bad that it’s not us. It’s the elites with insane amount of wealth. Plus most of us hate every part of the leadership that runs this country. How is it the common folk’s fault when you know damn good and well that it’s the crazy orange men. And I guess that justifies my statement in saying that, “Guess what bro, you are not the good ones either.”

        • marcos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          They just had the largest protest in their history, have a handful of cities under military intervention to stop the protests, and are close to elect somebody that promises to fight against the federal government as mayor of their largest city.

          What exactly do you expect them to do?

          • Kalysta@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 days ago

            They’re likely expecting what we here in America call a “second amendment solution”, while ignoring that anyone who tries that is going up against the most powerful military to ever exist and will just get themselves killed.

            It has taken the religious right almost 50 years of planning to take over government to this point. We’re not going to undo their bullshit overnight. But at least America is finally waking up to it and starting to work against the buffoon we unfathomably put in the white house. As well as the indoctrination the right wing of this country has been under for a generation now.

    • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      5 days ago

      The death of NATO is a good fucking thing. No more US military bases in the EU, no more forced expenditure of civil budget in weapons causing austerity, no more bombing of Libya and Yugoslavia, no more US influence in European politics. If you’re European you should salivate at the thought of NATO ending.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        The end of NATO doesn’t mean any of that. We have bases in non-NATO countries too, so obviously that isn’t because of NATO. It does mean Russia has almost free reign to invade more countries. If Russia can cause issues without being part of an alliance like NATO, why do you think the US can’t when it’s not part of NATO?

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          5 days ago

          First of all, the country currently forcing my country to cut expenditure in healthcare and to put it into military is the US, not Russia. And the country funding and arming the most flagrant example of genocide in the 21st century is the US.

          Second of all, Russia doesn’t have geopolitical reasons, nor the military/economic strength, to invade EU countries. And even if it did, the EU has nukes so you don’t need further military expenditure as deterrent.

          Third, even if you forget all I’ve said above, the EU can still have a military alliance without the US, and it would be a much better thing.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            First of all, the country currently forcing my country to cut expenditure in healthcare and to put it into military is the US, not Russia.

            Wrong. There’s no requirement for spending as a part of NATO. There’s also no requirement for the US to do anything. The invasion of Ukraine by Russia is almost certainly the reason your country, whichever it is, is increasing military spending.

            Second of all, Russia doesn’t have geopolitical reasons, nor the military/economic strength, to invade EU countries.

            They have reasons. Some EU nations are former Soviet states. Just the “restore the former borders of the Soviet union” reason is reason enough, ignoring the resources or anything else. Do they have the strength? Why is that included here. Does it matter? It doesn’t have to be smart to happen.

            And even if it did, the EU has nukes so you don’t need further military expenditure as deterrent.

            I don’t know what you people who keep bringing up nukes think they’re for. You can’t use them. Using them will only ensure you lose, because everyone turns against you. They are only useful to deter other nuclear strikes, and also to deter nations from creating a last stand situation where you have already lost so there’s nothing to lose in using nukes. You can’t win a war with nukes.

            Third, even if you forget all I’ve said above, the EU can still have a military alliance without the US, and it would be a much better thing.

            Forget or dispute? You’re implying your logic is faultless. Anyway, sure. They can. They don’t though. I advocate that they do. I’d love to see the EU with its own defensive force. I don’t want them to be reliant on the US, like they currently are. However, that necessarily requires most EU nations to increase their military spending, which you’re apparently against. You want magic, not reality. You want all the benefits of military power without any of the costs. Sorry. That can’t happen.

            • plyth@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              They can. They don’t though. I advocate that they do. I’d love to see the EU with its own defensive force

              Article 42

              And

              The command was designed in light of growing hostilities between European countries and Russia since the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and in response to logistic and bureaucratic hurdles limiting military logistics in case of a crisis.

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Support_and_Enabling_Command

            • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              4 days ago

              There’s no requirement for spending as a part of NATO.

              Not a strict requirement, but pressure to do so. Whose idea was it to raise to 5% again? The only president who rejected the idea, Pedro Sanchez from Spain, got threatened with tariffs if Spain doesn’t conform.

              They have reasons. Some EU nations are former Soviet states. Just the “restore the former borders of the Soviet union” reason is reason enough

              Russia has been pushing for closer political and economic ties with Europe for the past 30 years. Russia was promised that if they dismantled the communist project NATO would cease to expand eastward, and NATO kept expanding eastward regardless. Turns out NATO was never about defending Europe (because it never has), it was always about creating tensions between Russia and Europe because a continuous political alliance of industrialized nations that spans from Gibraltar to Bering would be too powerful for the US to control.

              The invasion of Ukraine by Russia is almost certainly the reason your country, whichever it is, is increasing military spending.

              The justification is the invasion of Ukraine. But as a European, the number of times our military has been used to defend Europe has been 0 since WW2, it’s only ever used to support US imperial ambitions, to bomb brown children, or to keep control over colonies in Africa. Europe deals so much fucking damage with its imperialism, that’s one of the biggest reasons I don’t want military expenditure. They tell us it’s to defend from “le evil Ruzzians” but 5 years later Europe will be bombing brown children with that money, mark my words. For fuck’s sake Europe can’t even stop supporting the genocide of Palestinians. How can you want Europe to spend more money in military instead of engaging in diplomacy and not antagonising Russia?

              Do they have the strength? Why is that included here. Does it matter?

              It does matter. If Europe already has the military strength to repel Russia, why do you want the extra expenditure in weapons?

              They are only useful to deter other nuclear strikes,

              Why wasn’t the Soviet Union or any of its satellite states invaded by the west since they got the nukes, then? The cold war was raging, and yet there was no incident of overt military conflict between eastern and western block. How so?

              I’d love to see the EU with its own defensive force

              If love to see the EU pushing for diplomacy and not antagonising the largest country in the world which happens to be right beyond its borders. I would line to see a European military alliance independent from the US but I wouldn’t like it spending 5% of the yearly budget at the cost of already starving healthcare, education and pensions. Denmark already approved to raise retirement to 70 fucking years old in order to pay for this, Finland is pushing to remove holidays from the calendar, and England already said that raising this budget will have effects on expenditure in social services. This is absolute bullshit.

              We have the far right getting stronger and stronger due to the worsening living conditions of Europeans because of austerity policy and lack of intervention of things like salaries or rent prices. Cool, let’s increase military expenditure to 5% right before fucking LePen, AfD, Vox and their equivalents get to the governments, what could possibly go wrong? Remember my words: in 5 years time, the European money will be spent not in conflict against Russia, but in middle east / Africa. Supporting military expenditure of the west is absolutely crazy.

              You want magic, not reality. You want all the benefits of military power without any of the costs

              No, I dont want the benefits of military power because I’m not a warmongering European chauvinist like you, I want the benefits of diplomacy, of social spending, and of good relations with neighbouring counteies. I don’t want my fucking healthcare money to end up in the pockets of Rheinmetall in order to lobby my politicians to go to war. I’m an able-bodied male and I don’t want my country to send me to be cannon fodder in the name of European imperialism.

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                Alright, you’re just being a Russian mouthpiece.

                Oh, Russia was promised NATO wouldn’t expand? Not so much.

                The entire rest of your comment is similar Russian drivel. I’m not going to spend any more time with this because your opinion is not founded in logic. “You can’t reason someone out of a position they didn’t reason themselves into.” You have a chip on your shoulder and it’s hindering your understanding.

                As I think it was a professor of mine said, international politics is about power, not good. States are always doing things to make themselves more powerful. None of them are good. Some of them are just temporarily doing more evil to gain power than others. Once you look at the world with this point of view, it makes much more sense (though some leaders are just stupid, crazy, or self-obsessed).

                • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.comBanned
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 days ago

                  “You disagree with my point of view, so I’m not gonna respond to any of your arguments because my state propaganda told me your point of view is forbidden and ontologically evil and I can automatically discard any discussion about it. Yes, I’m the one whose opinion is founded on logic”

                  Please explain me how my concerns about the far right rising (arguably pro-russian) and the worries about the welfare state in Europe and my support for a EU-wide military alliance are Russian talking points.

                • plyth@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Such an agreement was never made," NATO says in a fact page on its website, one of multiple pages that addresses the Russian allegations. “NATO’s door has been open to new members since it was founded in 1949 — and that has never changed.”

                  In the Tucker interview Putin references the meeting where he asked for membership. The minutes of that meeting could have been published to proof him wrong. In other words Russia was kept out and as an opponent by the choice of Nato.

                  Besides the wording is that there was no agreement and not that there were no promises. That suggests that Russia’s point of view is not entirely wrong.

                  As I think it was a professor of mine said, international politics is about power, not good. States are always doing things to make themselves more powerful.

                  In that light, aren’t Nato’s actions forcing Russia’s hands?

    • Makhno@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      51
      ·
      5 days ago

      Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

      Casting the first stone from paradise, eh?

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        5 days ago

        Americans have been burning paradise. Sit yout ass down and be quiet.

        • arcterus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          I mean, not to absolve America of anything, but it’s not like the rest of the world hasn’t been complicit in burning paradise either.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    So we dont buy US military kit. It’s got kill switches and hard to keep running without their support. It’s increasing looking like they aren’t aligned with the free world.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well, in a democracy it’s important that people who want this can try to make it happen via official procedure, which this is.

    That said, the people who want this are assholes and probably in bed with Russia.

    • IceFoxX@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      That is the problem with democracies - they have no active protection of their own because it would be undemocratic on principle.

  • UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    5 days ago

    Just removing the US from another world stage

    Soon we will be completely irrelevant

    Which is the plan

      • saimen@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Only “solution” I see is civil war. The nukes are still a problem for the rest of the world though

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Eeeeehhh, if you just look at numbers of boats, yes. The US Navy has far, far more experience, though. Drones are also going to change the game in ways we’re only starting to see with the Ukraine War. With that, the answer might be “everyone’s boats are sunk now”.

          China probably couldn’t gain air superiority over Taiwan, and without that, an invasion will fail. That will be true even if the US ends up losing more boats.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          5 days ago

          sounds like E1 speak to me. I’m sure your BIL is a lovely cadet, but he should learn when to turn-to and stfu.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      I wish they were just removing themselves from the world stage. What they’re actually doing is shifting away from a model of direct co-operation with allied nations and strong economic ties with otherwise less friendly nations, to unilateral action wherever and whenever they feel like it.

      Their foreign policy isn’t moving towards isolationism, it’s moving towards unchecked fascist domination.

      • Wooki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        lol the currency is heading to worthless, what are they going to buy resources with? Trade also requires allies.