• smitten@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a more concise answer to the second one would be; it depends on where you decide to round, but as you run it, it approaches 100%, or 99.99 repeating (which is 100%)

    • xthexder@l.sw0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      The screenshot displays 3 decimal places, which is the the precision I used. As it turns out, even just rounding to the nearest integer still requires checking more numbers than we even have the primes enumerated for (e^200 or 7x10^86)