• LufyCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Makes sense, if stuff is subsidized, the government has to pay for it. If the government doesn’t have money to pay for it, they’ll just print it out of thin air, devaluing the currency (and thus taxing the working class).

    There’s gonna be a lot of pain for Argentinians in the months and years to come, hopefully it’ll all be worth it…

      • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        No, you’re right, let’s better keep our ruler class’ pockets full. That won’t bite us in the ass.

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Then tax or seize their wealth. The loss of subsidies will specifically hurt the poorer much harder than the wealthy. The wealthy will just push their increased burden from loss of subsidies off onto the poor like they always do.

  • Gabu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Who could’ve guessed that a rightwing government wouldn’t solve their issues (which were originally caused by rightwing policies)?

      • Gabu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The implosion of Argentina is a very complex issue, but, essentially, the country allowed itself to be informally dollarized and ceded control over most of its industries to international (read corporativist) interests. When Perón restructured the country, it was done with a limited scope and with relatively short term changes, causing their economy to collapse again later (it doesn’t help that Brazil, a powerful potential ally, had undergone a rightwing U.S.-backed coup at the time). Then, the whole Falklands/Malvinas war happened, all rightwing bullshit, and the country still hasn’t bounced back.

  • guajojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ffs stop trying to spread hate on this guy, at least try harder, biased articles and no context titles are not helping your dumb agenda either

    • wafflez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      He genuinelly is not a good person. He’s a glorified US fanboy anti lgbtq+ “anarcho capitalist.” He also is against abortion. Where is this hopeful wiggleroom you have?

      • guajojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Idgf he’s a good person or not, he’s supposed to rule a country and stabilize the economy for the argentinian people. Since he’s not aligned with the popular party of the Internet he’s getting so much hate and from people that haven’t even been to south America.

  • stirner@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Who would’ve known, the man that made it so people can get their salary in jugs of milk is a complete idiot.

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Look, theres a lot of reasons this guy sucks.

    Increasing the costs of two things that are causing the most damange to our planet is not a reason to criticize him tho.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      sure it is. removing subsidies on commodities like gas doesn’t change the demand for gas, it just puts more of a burden on poor people, and doesn’t matter at all to the rich who use it most. that path will only lead to backlash against green policies in general, see the yellow vest protests. in order to reduce consumption you actually need to reduce demand by giving people sustainable alternatives.

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        How the fuck do they afford subsidies? Why do you think they have been in this crisis for 30 years? It is a well educated and fairly modern society. But if you think socialist programs can be paid by borrowing money or printing money indefinitely and won’t result in cronic poor outcomes then you have little understanding of basic economics.

    • moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This guy isn’t a climate activist. It’s funny to see the price of fuel going up with a climate denier.