• iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Could also have a system where multiple arbritrators separately decide on a case, say 3 arbitrators per dispute by default, and if there’s a disagreement, more arbitrators decide until above x% of them agree on the resolution

    • nihilist@monero.townOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      yea but if all the arbitrators are corrupt on the network side, no matter how many you put on the arbitration the outcome wouldnt really change right ?

      • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        True, and any rewards to the arbitrators would be less and less if they get divided equally