A career State Department official resigned from her post on Tuesday, saying she could no longer work for the Biden administration after it released a report concluding that Israel was not preventing the flow of aid to Gaza.

Stacy Gilbert, who served as a senior civilian-military advisor to the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration (PRM), sent an email to staff saying she was resigning because she felt the State Department had made the wrong assessment, The Washington Post reported, citing officials who read the note.

The report was filed in response to President Joe Biden issuing a national security memorandum (NSM-20) in early February on whether the administration finds credible Israel’s assurances that its use of US weapons do not violate either American or international law.

The report said there were reasonable grounds to believe Israel on several occasions had used American-supplied weapons “inconsistent” with international humanitarian law, but said it could not make a definitive assessment - enough to prevent the suspension of arms transfers.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    So then what take should I have to prevent Trump from winning? Specifics. You know what works, tell us. So far I’ve got:

    You should first accept that based on all the information we have currently, Biden isn’t viable as a candidate, and that by continuing to promote the position that Biden is the only option when they obviously aren’t even an option at this point.

    So step one: Stop gaslighting people.

    People know when they are being lied to, and they especially know when they are being lied to by some one who has fully deluded themselves into thinking they know whats going on. Its what you are doing here with the false choice dichotomy you continuously try to draw.

    Step two: Stop supporting a failed strategy.

    Biden can be moved, and the DNC can and will swap him out if its obvious he can’t win. We need to show that this candidate can’t win now by audibly making it clear they don’t have enough support to win the election. This means ceasing to engage in apologetic for Biden. Put your criticisms where they belong: at the feet of Joe Biden and the DNC. They are the ones failing to do the work necessary this election cycle and if you think they aren’t listening, you are wrong. They are. They hear you here and elsewhere. You need to connect the strategy of “Blue-No-Matter-Who” to exactly why Biden is shaping up to lose this election whole cloth. Biden won 2020 because he had to come get progressive voters, black voters, youth voters. He did so through surrogates and through his platform. In 2020 Biden basically did a lift and shift of Bernies entire suite of platform issues. He needed to do so to get Bernies voters to come to him. By relinquishing your consent and getting nothing in return, you are setting Biden up for failure. Stop promoting this approach to voting. It does not work. It will lose us the election.

    Step Three: If you seek alternatives, you should propose them.

    You seem like clever folk. Why don’t you come up with some alternatives to Biden you find acceptable and which you think could be palatable to a broader audience. Present them here. We can have a conversation about them.

    We only entered the reformed primary system ~40 years ago. Its completely reasonable to expect that if Biden steps back as candidate, we can decide the entire thing at the convention. Its how the primaries have worked in this country for the majority of its history. Wilding et al. vs. DNC Services Corporation et al. 2017: The DNC’s choice of how to conduct its presidential nominating process is protected by the First Amendment, which means they can do what-ever the fuck they want to decide a candidate. They could hold a potato sack race if they so choose. There is no requirement that they regard their own charter in this manner.

    You seem to want to have an option before recognizing that the strategy you are committed to can’t win. That’s a personal preference of yours. And so if that’s your preference, you should propose some alternatives. I don’t feel the need to have an alternative in place once I recognize that the strategy I’ve selected doesn’t work. I personally recognize the importance of ‘empty space’ ; that if something can-not work, I recognize the importance of abandoning a failed approach as-soon-as-possible to create room for another option to exist. Its not about knowing what I’ll do instead, its about creating the space for another option to exist.

    To put it into metaphor, you are basically arguing that if I have an abusive boyfriend/ girlfriend/ partner, someone its just not going to work out with, I shouldn’t break up with them before I know who my next partner will be.

    • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You should first accept that based on all the information we have currently, Biden isn’t viable as a candidate, and that by continuing to promote the position that Biden is the only option when they obviously aren’t even an option at this point.

      This is pure conjecture. You have not provided any viable alternative. Once you do that we can discuss other options and if Biden is actually less viable.

      Can you point to a single misleading or inaccurate statement I’ve made about Joe Biden or the Democrats? Where have I ignored criticism? Everything else you say is based on this false and misleading premise that you’ve created and continuously cycle back to. You’re claiming that my strategy is flawed without providing evidence of alternatives. It’s amusing that you’ve written the same thing this many times to avoid backing up your claim but I think I’m good for now. You’re just going to keep playing games. Luckily it’s pretty obvious at this point.

      See you later!

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Its not a false premise whatsoever that Biden will not be the next president. Its the constant theme in all the data we have available to us on the matter.

        First approval polls:

        On this date of Trumps presidency, he was dick deep in covid and maybe the most uncertain period of time in recent history.

        Even with all that, he had five points on Biden: 42.6 to 37.8. Trump remained a one term president.

        Same date of George H.W. Bush’s presidency, Bush had 3 points on Biden, at 40.

        Jimmy Carter, another one term president. 40.7 on today’s date in his presidency.

        Literally every single one term President of the last 60 years was polling higher than Joe Biden is currently polling, at this exact point in their presidency.

        Presidents that won a second term? ALL of them were beating Bidens currently approval by 10 points or better on this date of their presidency. And more importantly, their polling percentage over time was rising, as in, going up and to the right. Bidens polling isn’t going up and to the right. Its going down. He’s not gaining traction, he’s losing it.

        Now onto head to head polls:

        Biden over-polls by about 4%, Trump under-polls by about 8% when compared to real election results:

        How is Biden polling in a head to head? He’s losing to Trump, and has been losing to Trump in head to head polling for over 400 days. Out of the last 50 polls, Biden has lost 47 of them in a head to head with Trump. Thats not accounting for differential sampling error. If you account for the typical pattern of sampling error we would associate with a Biden v Trump head to head, Biden has won precisely 0 polls against Trump in the last 400 days.

        If the election were tomorrow, it wouldn’t even be close. Trump would win in a blow out.

        You need to pull your head out of the sand.