• tsonfeir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    One of my biggest gripes about Linux in general is that none of the DEs can settle on a UI kit. I get WHY, but ffs, this is a major set back for various apps.

    • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Amarok uses Qt, just like every other KDE project. Likewise, I don’t think GNOME has any project not using GTK.

        • leopold@lemmy.kde.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What, the grey bars? Crappy is a rude way of putting it, but yes they looks pretty bad. I think that’s probably an artifact from the Qt4 days. It looked fine with Oxygen. Rest looks fine to me. If you think it looks busy, well the screenshot has a lot of panels enabled, just to showcase the features. IIRC many of them are not shown by default and a user would only keep the ones they need, since the interface is customizable.

          • tsonfeir@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I’m not trying to be “rude.” But the line height, weird font sizes, spacing between elements. Just everything about it screams function over form. There is a way to have both. Most software that adheres to modern design principles have overcome the “janky” UI

            • 高文偉@g0v.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              28 days ago

              @tsonfeir @leopold I think they’re more focused on fixing build errors and putting out a release for now, and leave UI updates for later. So we’re stuck with the old look for this release.