It would seem the design that can survive the most extinctions would be the clear winner in the end.

  • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’d say adaptability would be priority in an environment that is subject to frequent change. Environments that are largely static probably favor efficiency.

    • Fluke@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah. Countless examples going both directions. I wouldn’t call crocodilians super adaptable, but they are so well tuned for their specific environs that they’ve been largely unchanged for 94 MILLION years.

      I would argue that being warm blooded makes an animal more adaptable. Interestingly, it seems cold blooded reptiles evolved into warm blooded archosaurs which eventually led to cold blooded crocodilians. Tellingly, these active warm blooded ancestors are all extinct in favor of the passive, cold blooded, low adaptability ambush predator.

      In the opposite direction, the adaptable rat has done much better than the countless specialized species that have disappeared since the industrial revolution and human explosion.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        The thing about coastal areas is they’ll always be a part of Earth’s biosphere. Unlike plains or deserts or deciduous forests, which don’t have to exist, and can completely disappear, coastlines and estuaries can only move, never disappear.

        • Fluke@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          This is a cool point. I’ve never thought about that before. It’s a very stable environment allowing for efficiency to be selected for in ways that may decrease adaptability.

        • fishos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          A coastline absolutely can vanish(submerged) or be against geography, such as rocky cliffs, that is unsuitable. “Coastlines can’t stop existing, only move” is semantic nonesense.