It would seem the design that can survive the most extinctions would be the clear winner in the end.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This makes me wonder, why are there no 100% albino species considering albinos can be found in every species and can only produce other albino offspring when paired with other albinos?

    • IonAddis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Aren’t there, in blind cave species where there’s no pressure to select for coloring to protect from the sun or to camouflage or display for mates?

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      If they can only albino offspring when paired with other albinos that indicates it’s a recessive gene.

      Recessive genes don’t take over gene pools unless they confer some survival advantage.

    • raptir@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Albino is only used as a term when it’s a deviation from the species norm usually. There are all white cave bugs.

        • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          First, the vast majority of species depend on camouflage at least somewhat, since there are very few species that are neither predator nor prey. Also, albinism prevents your skin from properly protecting you from the sun. So even then, it is selected against. As other have pointed out though, caves don’t have either of these forces at play—the darkness makes visual camouflage irrelevant and there is no UV light. So there, as you predicted, most species are albino.