• Kerrigor@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hahahaha

      Sticking one’s head in the sand and pretending security is a non-issue is not actually more secure

      • WiildFiire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you can’t admit security is better through IOS then you’re the one sticking your head in the sand, tbh

        • Kerrigor@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Security on Android, as an OS, is arguably better. However in practice it’s very manufacturer-dependent. If they didn’t butcher the OS, and actually rolled updates without carriers getting in the way, it wouldn’t be a contest at all.

          • Quentinp@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            " If they didn’t butcher the OS, and actually rolled updates without carriers getting in the way, it wouldn’t be a contest at all." but they did though.

      • Quentinp@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh?

        Unfortunately for Android users, Google researchers discovered known vulnerabilities, or n-days, that essentially equated to zero-days for Android due to a lack of timely patching issues. The vendor observed that attackers didn’t need zero-day exploits to attack the Android ecosystem because in many cases, patches weren’t available for known flaws, which were then exploited on unpatched devices.