What do y’all think? Does switching to Linux as an entire corporation mean RedHat? Or could it be done on a distro like Debian?

  • Suzune@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I have not the slightest idea why companies use Red Hat. When people think this is how Linux is, no wonder they think Linux sucks.

    I have to use Red Hat and I cannot stop thinking about how much more professional Debian appears to me. They can at least make decent packages that work properly.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      First-mover advantage, combined with a long tail of support and the cost of migrating to a new platform.

      RedHat was, for a VERY long time, the only real commercially supported Linux with SLAs and long-term roadmaps and backported security patches: and yes, Debian does those, but they don’t offer any sort of guarantees that corpo management types really really like.

      • uhN0id@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        It was also one of the only (that I can remember aside from maybe SUSE - maaaybe Slack?) actually putting their distro in stores back in the 90s. I was a middle schooler and used Christmas money to buy RedHat at Best Buy (I had no idea what I was doing) because I thought it was the distro to get. I can’t remember a single other distro more synonymously associated with Linux than RedHat because they were marketed hard and were widely available for purchase which I’m guessing made them at least appear more legitimate to new Linux consumer and business adopters.