• gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    From someone who has gone to more than a few political protests and rallies in Boston:

    Every fucking time Socialist Alternative shows up, it’s fine until some edgelord dipshit unfurls the fucking huge Soviet flag with Stalin and Mao silk screened on it. It’s like they’re trying to alienate reasonable people as well as historically-informed people. I consider myself a staunch socialist. I also outright detest Stalin and Mao because they were fucking authoritarian despots who wrapped their regimes in “communism” banners.

    Sure, some of the systems at lower levels were socialistic, but at the end of the day, it was all in service to the cult of personality in charge of the whole gig. And yes, that’s what the US has devolved into (and arguably had done so quite a while ago, just not so overtly), but that doesn’t excuse Stalin or Mao, nor does it justify being an apologist for them.

    • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Oh man, a thousand times this, fucking tankies are a pain and a ball and chain on the leg of progress.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Every fucking time Socialist Alternative shows up, it’s fine until some edgelord dipshit unfurls the fucking huge Soviet flag with Stalin and Mao silk screened on it.

      I’m not super familiar with Socialist Alternative, but aren’t they a Trotskyist org? What are they doing waving Stalin flags?

      • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        The only person I’ve encountered waving Stalin flag at a protest said they were a Maoist when I asked

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I also outright detest Stalin and Mao because they were fucking authoritarian despots

      You could easily say the same of Washington or Eisenhower or Churchill or DeGualle.

      Hell, Lincoln got got by a guy who was literally shouting “Sic Semper Tyrantus”.

      The thing that sets Stalin and Mao apart from the Francos and Mussolinis and Tojos and Chang Kai-Sheks and Churchills was their break from the old line aristocracy. The thing westerners hate more than anything was their overthrow of the local monarchies.

      That’s why you have folks weeping big crocodile tears over Anastasia and Puyi, while they whistle past the graveyard of the countless Chinese and Russian victims of Romanov/Qing Dynasty misrule.

    • solarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      From that perspective, any thoughts on Ho Chi Minh?

      Of all the leaders good, bad, and, ugly over the last century, he doesn’t seem to be brought up as much by propaganda machines.

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why is it always Mao or Stalin? Can’t they at least go with folks who shed the blood of fascists like Tito or Castro? They werent particularly good either but at least they were doing the best with their dealt decks. Mind you I fucking loathe elevating folks to positions of respect unless they were my ancestors or damned well earned it via death and glory.