The last shot I posted gained some traction, so I felt like sharing some more of what I’ve done with my scanner camera. The scan is done from top to bottom in about 2 minutes, the model did a great job of staying still throughout.

While scanning motion is definitely eye-catching and spectacular, there are other qualities to appreciate. The gorgeous soft, yet tack sharp aesthetic of large format photography is easily available with a scanner.

Usually I fight the IR-super sensitivity of the sensor, but this time it made her skin iridescent against the rock in the background.

  • hhhyperfocus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Very cool. I like the vertical black lines, it looks like a film reel from an old movie that has been scratched going thru the projector.

  • Guadin@k.fe.derate.me
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    It really gives an “old camera” vibe. It would be fitting if the background was fake, just in the old images. You have an eye for composition as well.

  • lechatron@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    That’s interesting! I assume you’re using some kind of pinhole camera setup that focuses the light on the top of the scanner tray? Would really love to see what the camera looks like!

    • Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      In basic principle it’s a pinhole camera using a scanner as the photosensitive surface. I’ve stuck a magnifier glass to the front, it gives some sharpness and a lot of possibilities outside of a simple pinhole.

      There’s a picture of the camera in my comment history, its violently unimpressive

      • lechatron@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        Pretty much what I expected it to look like! It’s really interesting and I bet will make for some fun photos. Basically a very slow horizontal shutter.

      • IMALlama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        What kind of angle of view do you think you get with this setup? I imagine it would be pretty wide, but could be way off.

        • Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          I’m not really one for numbers, and I don’t know understand your question.

          If a 180 degree cone in front of the lens is the widest, I think this setup can do something like 80 degrees, and does its best work between 50 to 70. That said, this purely finger in weather approximation, I’m not really interested in the numbers when I do these shots

  • Windows_Error_Noises@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Yes! Marvelous! I’m so happy to see more of your gorgeous work. I just love it - as a concept, and its results; what a damned cool way to art.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Very intriguing effect. Dreamlike. Does the camera have a viewfinder, or do you just have to experiment to get the framing right?

    • Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      There’s no viewfinder at the moment. I point the camera to the best of my ability, do a low resolution scan over about 10 seconds, and adjust appropriately. Framing and focus is difficult, but gets easier over time. Whenever I have people helping or modeling on a picture, I make very sure they’re aware that it is a messy trial and error process.

    • Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      I haven’t messed with moving the camera around, but I’ve done heaps of experiments with motion in front of the camera.

      I do have a dream of doing a sort of anamorphic projection through time, that will require camera motion, but that’s on the cooker for now

  • Mallory@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    I don’t understand what is it you did but I’m glad you did it because this looks amazing