• echo64@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    It can make sense also, for example, in parts of the world that aren’t a good fit for solar power. I’d argue for more nuclear before space solar, but it’s not like there’s zero sense in it.

    wild how people literally can’t read more than one sentence before replying.

    • Windex007@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I thought based on your first sentence which implied fusion was a pipe dream, that the second paragraph suggesting “more nuclear” would be referring to fission. “More” implies some already exists, and as you’ve already noted, there is no fusion in use.