Applicants for German citizenship will be required to explicitly affirm Israel’s right to exist under a new citizenship law which came into effect on Tuesday.

The new law shortened the number of years that a person must have lived in Germany in order to obtain a passport, from eight to five years. It will also allow first-generation migrants to be dual citizens.

As part of the shake-up, new questions were added to the country’s citizenship test, including about Judaism and Israel’s right to exist.

  • YourPrivatHater@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It is by definition the same. And if you think otherwise, you can do so outside of Germany, at best outside of EU.

      • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The definition used by German authorities subsumes antizionism, i.e. denying Israel’s right to exist, as a special form of antisemitism.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          It is quite reductive to say anti-zionism is just denying the right of Israel to exist. Yes, the state of Israel is a deeply zionist project but you can accept the reality of this state existing and still be opposed to the idea of zionism in general.

          I am opposed to the idea of colonialism in general but still accept the existence of states with a colonial history.

          • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            That’s a good point. I’ve always thought antizionism and denying Israel’s right to exist where somehow identical.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        by any definition

        The IHRA’s definition does, so you can’t say “any”.

        That said, the IHRA definition was pretty specifically created to be zionist and a shield for Israel, and should be rejected on those grounds.