The Trump administration has codified its efforts to strip some Americans of their US citizenship in a recently published justice department memo that directs attorneys to prioritize denaturalization for naturalized citizens who commit certain crimes.

The memo, published on 11 June, calls on attorneys in the department to institute civil proceedings to revoke a person’s United States citizenship if an individual either “illegally procured” naturalization or procured naturalization by “concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation”.

At the center of the move are the estimated 25 million US citizens who immigrated to the country after being born abroad, according to data from 2023 – and it lists 10 different priority categories for denaturalization.

According to the memo, those subjected to civil proceedings are not entitled to an attorney like they are in criminal cases. And the government has a lighter burden of proof in civil cases than they do in criminal ones.

Edit: According to the Miami Herald, it depends on where you live:

The Supreme Court’s ruling means the judges’ injunctions blocking Trump’s executive order only affect the jurisdictions where immigrant groups filed their lawsuits — leaving the rest of the country, including Florida, subject to the president’s citizenship order. The turn of events is likely to lead to more federal lawsuits, including a class action case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union in New Hampshire on Friday.

Source:

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          So you’ve taken part in Paris riots? Did anything you were a part of change to more your liking?

          • Atomic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Dude. The French will protest for anything they don’t like. Last year farmers were upset over grocery imports that drove them out of the market and so they blocked roads, railroads, poured shit outside of government buildings.

            They figuratively wrote the book

          • swemg@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes. Not on everything but at least we tried. Also we don’t have an openly fascist régime or a convicted felon rapist as a president. Not saying we’re good but at least we’re trying.

            • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Did you see that we had a 6 million people, peaceful protest? If those turned into riots, so many people would have been murdered by our government and “with justification.” Riots are what the government wants. They’re itching for reasons to take over democratic cities. We’re different.

              • swemg@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Y’all in deep shit yes. I don’t see your democratic cities staying democratic long, from an external eye. Protests should have happened even before the election. That’s just my comment.