• Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It is obviously cosmetic as it relates to appearance. That can still be a serious issue but then you go on to dismiss dental care.

    Someone with damaged teeth would disagree with you because of appearance, health, social and mental impact of living with and having to hide damaged teeth.

    Arguing trans healthcare should always come first because you prefer it in your situation is a shit argument.

    You’re saying the majority of people to put trans healthcare at the bottom of the list of priorities because it doesn’t affect them.

    Besides this isn’t an ‘us’ vs ‘them’ issue. There was zero reason to make that argument.

    Edit: I even fact checked myself on my ‘obviously cosmetic’ claim. Mayo clinic: https://www.webmd.com/a-to-z-guides/what-is-tracheal-shave

    Also, as the procedure is generally considered cosmetic

    • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      its not cosmetic, its reconstructive. i dont give a fuck what some fascistic cis people think is ‘cosmetic’ or not, the term is mostly just used by insurance companies and governments to weasel out of paying out to medically necessary interventions.

      why the fuck are you in this comm? leave.

      • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m a trans commie and think dysphoria is generally cosmetic, and think its fucked both teeth and ffs aren’t covered.

        But I guess I just don’t like punching down

        • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          It is fucked that both teeth and ffs are arbitrarily gate kept in order to balance the books in a deeply disfunctuonal healthcare system. It should obviously all be free at the point of care. And the only reason it isn’t is to deny care to poor people.

          What’s obnoxious are the cises showing up (in other comments) to be like " um actually if you look up the medical authorities in the fascist country America people say it’s cosmetic". 🤓

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah I agree with that, and people need their argument dopamine hit so things are gonna by defualt get unruly pretty quick.

            I think the only thing I disagree with is making it too much of an us vs them situation, as hard as that is when it feels like they’re doing the same, but hey maybe I was just born out of hippie times and am feeling the pain lmao - they had some shit going on when they disagreed with labels being overly general in my opinion

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              I agree, some people are just argumentative, there’s a time and a place.

              I take the criticism about making this too us vs them, but part of the reason for the reaction was not about dividing people but pushing back on bad behavior. Anyone who views themselves as a cis ‘ally’ who finds themselves in the situation of trying to ‘prove their point’ to a bunch of trans people in a trans space really needs to self-crit and step back.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        I am happy to be corrected about whether specific surgeries are considered cosmetic or not but I do not, as a rule, take the comments of random people on the internet as gospel.

        what some fascistic cis people

        Do you have something against the Mayo clinic?

        Not that I need to explain to you but I commented because I saw a misguided comment and was hoping to have an open discussion about how healthcare should always be available to those who need it.

        I’ll be here all week. :)

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      Cosmetic surgery relates to appearance. Transition related surgeries relate to dysphoria

      Someone with damaged teeth would disagree with you because of appearance, health, social and mental impact of living with and having to hide damaged teeth.

      Both my partner and myself both have damaged teeth. It’s nothing like that

      Arguing trans healthcare should always come first because you prefer it in your situation is a shit argument.

      I don’t need it. I was fortunate enough to be able to self fund my own surgeries. But doing so has had long lasting effects on my financial security.

      Notably, I didn’t spend that money on teeth or any other cosmetic issues, because it’s not even remotely the same. Spending my future to make my teeth look better would be a poor choice.

      Spending my future to deal with my dysphoria was what I had to do to ensure that I had a future.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’re not getting it.

        In a discussion about healthcare and insurance coverage this should not be one or the other.

        • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Yeah, the trans person, talking about first hand experiences navigating this exact topic is the one who doesn’t get it…

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            A type 1 diabetic with ruined teeth would likely disagree with you on priorities. Having a mouth full of rotting teeth is painful, unattractive and can cause severe distress and social isolation, even depression.

            It can also contribute to other severe medical problems such as a massively increased risk of heart attack.

            You are putting your own struggles first and foremost while dismissing the pain and sufferring of others. I am saying neither people with dental problems or trans people should be denied healthcare, you are saying

            my problems are more important so only my problems should be dealt with

            I am disagreeing with your argument because it dismisses a genuine and serious form of medical care that should be afforded to all who need it.

            Trans surgeries are not “cosmetic”.

            The Mayo clinic, which is a respected source, disagrees with you on at least one of the surgeries being sought.

            Speaking as a trans person,

            Your experience is valid.

            access to trans healthcare is far more important to me than dental healthcare.

            And you shouldn’t dismiss the experiences and needs of others.

            • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.mlM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              The Mayo clinic, which is a respected source,

              Love getting shit gate kept by fucking assholes, eat my entire ass

              Healthcare is only rationed out out the way that it is because profiteering middle men make money by denying care

              • Cypher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Citing a reputable source regarding the classification of a surgical procedure isn’t gatekeeping.

                • Diva (she/her)@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I am not going to debate shit with cis in the transgender comm.

                  Universal classifications of procedures are a tool for denying care inside a fucked up healthcare system, we all agree that our healthcare system is fucked. Nobody is saying that dental care shouldn’t also be a priority and it’s insulting having cis dumbasses roll up to try to be like "um aktually I’m simply citing sources at you "

                  Since you’re citing a US source, the medical system here is set up by insurance companies to deny care by classifying things as requiring specific diagnosis and all that does is restrict access to everyone and artificially drive up costs to benefit the profiteers. It’s also often structured to be incredibly harmful to poor people who need the care that’s being denied.

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              A type 1 diabetic with ruined teeth would likely disagree with you on priorities

              That’s my partner. Her teeth are absolutely on the list, but transition care is above it.

              • Cypher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                …and you still think dental shouldn’t be covered?

                What aren’t you grasping about both of these things beeing freely available as the best option?

                • marcie (she/her)@lemmy.mlM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  how many brain cells do you have? 2? 3? she said her partner has fucked teeth. they consider FFS more important. does that mean they dont want their fucked teeth fixed? NO. jesus fuck, get out of here you cis garbage

                  • Cypher@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    she said her partner has fucked teeth.

                    There are degrees of damage, but that’s not the point.

                    does that mean they dont want their fucked teeth fixed? NO.

                    Like I said; it was an argument they shouldn’t have made because it is fundamentally flawed.

                    get out of here you cis garbage

                    Just because people have hurt you does not mean you need to lash out like this. It does you no favours, and you should do better.

          • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 months ago

            No offence but comments like this are only harmful to our community, and I know saying this might not change your mind on anything, but I’d feel wrong if I didn’t ask.

            Don’t try to speak for all of us, I know many of us have been treated horribly for years simply because who we are, and as fucked as that is it doesn’t make it ok to put your trauma above others, in a way that may be affected by your personal bias.

            The queer community has always been about outsiders, arguably even more so than simply about sex or gender, and in that vein I couldnt go to bed comfortably if I could gaurentee ffs to some of our sisters while leaving millions in constant physical pain, just like I feel looking in the mirror every day.

            This is class warfare, not bum fights in an alleyway - cause we all know the upper class has rock solid solidarity, and we don’t stand a chance until we do as well.

            • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Transition surgery is healthcare, not cosmetic. That’s all I said.

              This idea that trans healthcare trumps other healthcare needs is something the person I was talking to said, not something I said

              • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                I appreciate how you took ‘our’ in an individual sense, it takes a certain level of mental warping to achieve

                • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Where did they take it to an individual sense? You’re being a “pickme” and arguing for respectability politics. I vehemently disagree that trans people need to make ourselves and our rights palatable to non-queer folks.

                  • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Pickme to me means someone that always tries to steal the spotlight, an individual (though I’m not too up to date on my buzzwords admittedly).

                    I also agree trans people don’t need to cater to others, but also we don’t need to be dicks cause yeah that’s just gonna enforce peoples bias’ - leave that shit to reddit/twitter.