• smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Okey, would your opinion be the same if instead Lyft would announce Man+, an option for man to drive more frequently with man or non-binary? There are plenty of man who would feel safer having their own space.

    I have no problem and won’t ever rage at choice, but Lyft choices feels like treating woman as a minority:

    • Switch off: man, woman, non-binary, trans, queer, …
    • Switch on: woman, non-binary, trans, queer, …

    Why woman are being put in this group, but man not? It’s not like they too are almost half of the society, aren’t they? Also, how can someone not feel excluded, when there is literally a switch to turn off him because of the gender?

      • smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Imagine what if you were talking to actually sexually abused person. He asks why as a man he cannot have such protective feature too and as reponse instead of any empathy from you got dry calculated explanation as if he didn’t know about female being abused, with mixed ad hominem ended by “talk to a woman”.