This comment was in response to someone expressing regret about joining .ml if I recall correctly

Edit: I’m convinced all this guy does is camp out in front of his computer and wait for an excuse to abuse what itty bitty power he has.

  • PugJesus@lemmy.worldMEnglish
    0·
    3 months ago

    As mentioned above, there is no genocide, and that’s why no credible source is speaking about a genocide.

    Theoretically speaking, what sources would you accept as authoritative on the matter of an ongoing genocide?

    • YourPrivatHater@ani.socialEnglish
      0·
      3 months ago

      There is no credible authority body that calles or doesn’t call something genocide, genocide has a very clear definition and genocide is defined according to that definition, ICJ does try to be neutral but Israel has as said a very hard time with UN because UN turned into a anti Israel body, so they don’t get people into Gaza or Israel. The only external people in gaza currently are a few selected journalists that travel with IDF (CNN from what i know, maybe the guardian, but I’m not certain on that) or the hamas propaganda speakers that call themselves journalists (aljazeera) but are legally not.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.worldMEnglish
        0·
        3 months ago

        There is no credible authority body that calles or doesn’t call something genocide, genocide has a very clear definition and genocide is defined according to that definition,

        Then why say

        and that’s why no credible source is speaking about a genocide.

        as an objection?

        You’re all over the place.

        • YourPrivatHater@ani.socialEnglish
          0·
          3 months ago

          You asked about a credible source for something, and for a authority body, those are different things so there are different answers