• toasteecup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    The funny thing is, as far as I read it, people shouldn’t be allowed fire arms unless they are a part of a militia which those got depreciated by having a centralized army.

    • PizzaMan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yeah. The whole point of the constitution was to change it over time to suit the needs of the people. And a policy/interpretation of “no gun restrictions are allowed ever until the end of time” is such a horrendous one.

      It’s long past time it’s seen a revision.

      • toasteecup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not opposed to it. I don’t think it has any value given the superiority of the military but hey constitution allows it. Mind you there are some caveats like said militia being used to break laws or conduct insurrection