It’s just kinda the implied meaning of what you said? My comment can be rephrased as “it’s better to be alive and in court than dead” to which you responded “guaranteed the people who say that haven’t had to deal with the court”. So if that’s not what you meant then what did you mean?
Yeah, and those guys have guaranteed never had to fight hostile litigation / prosecution and finance it.
It’s better to be alive and in court than dead
So, following what you said, people who would rather be alive and in court over dead haven’t had to deal with hostile litigation. So the superior stance to have on this binary is that it’s better to be dead. Because dealing with hostile litigation is so much trouble its preferable to just die. Am I missing something? Am I misinterpreting?
I have no idea what you’re doing over there. Apparently taking words at face value is not one of your strong points. I’ll enjoy your down vote. Have a lovely week.
You’d rather be dead than deal with fussy legal shit?
And where did I say that?
It’s just kinda the implied meaning of what you said? My comment can be rephrased as “it’s better to be alive and in court than dead” to which you responded “guaranteed the people who say that haven’t had to deal with the court”. So if that’s not what you meant then what did you mean?
What I posted, nothing more.
Alright.
So, following what you said, people who would rather be alive and in court over dead haven’t had to deal with hostile litigation. So the superior stance to have on this binary is that it’s better to be dead. Because dealing with hostile litigation is so much trouble its preferable to just die. Am I missing something? Am I misinterpreting?
I have no idea what you’re doing over there. Apparently taking words at face value is not one of your strong points. I’ll enjoy your down vote. Have a lovely week.
Ok lol. Take it easy