Possibly linux@lemmy.zip to MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agoTankies eager to find issues with Torlemmy.zipimagemessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageTankies eager to find issues with Torlemmy.zipPossibly linux@lemmy.zip to MeanwhileOnGrad@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
You should absolutely test and improve software like Tor. However, this post is more anti Tor than anything else.
minus-squareDahGangalang@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI mean, isn’t that a legitimate concern considering how many privacy focused services are built on top of / around TOR?
minus-squarekhannie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoDefinitely. Any time there’s a de-anonymisation where Tor is involved it should be closely looked at IMO.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.zipOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoTor isn’t perfect and never was. As it turns out nothing is perfect or perfectly secure. The problem with some of these articles is that it encourages people not to use Tor even though it is one of the best tools
I mean, isn’t that a legitimate concern considering how many privacy focused services are built on top of / around TOR?
Definitely. Any time there’s a de-anonymisation where Tor is involved it should be closely looked at IMO.
Tor isn’t perfect and never was. As it turns out nothing is perfect or perfectly secure.
The problem with some of these articles is that it encourages people not to use Tor even though it is one of the best tools