An openly Democratic Socialist Candidate in the United States of America is now within striking distance of winning mayorship of the city that is the beating heart of American capitalism. In only 8 1/2 months of campaigning we have gone from 1% in the polls to now being the electoral favorite.
This is perhaps a long shot, but if you are reading this, we are still looking for people to work the phones for Zohran today and tomorrow! No requirement to live in NYC, just to have a US phone number. We have 9 different phonebanking times today and offer 27 second language options! We need all of the help we can get to win this, and every little bit helps. Please consider signing up for a shift here even if you can only make a few calls.
As somebody working for the campaign, I’m not really supposed to say this, but if you don’t feel comfortable using personally identifiable information, you can use a fake name, burner email, and Google voice number. I don’t really care. We need people working the phones. Zohran is not even above 90% name recognition yet among potential voters, and 4% of voters are still undecided. If even one of you signs up, please let me know so I can recognize you for your efforts to the community here.
Can’t wait to see how he gets rat fucked!
First you get rat fucked. Then you get rat fucked more. Then you win.
Worked for Bernie!
But in all seriousness hope he wins lol.
Here’s how Bernie can still get rat fucked
is there any chance he’ll run independent/WFP if he loses?
I have no comment on this beyond I believe he should
How does this voting system work? Are people really voting for mayor 9 times or are some of the rounds based on ranked choices people made in previous rounds? (i think I can see what’s going on though… round 1 was a real vote and then the rest are removing the lowest and adding their votes based on their 2nd (or whatever…) choice)
They’re voting once, but placing as many rankings as they want.
So if someone submitted a ballot with:
#1 Lander
#2 Mamdani
It wouldn’t affect anything for the first 6 rounds of the hypothetical election result in the OPs post. But on the seventh round, Lander would be eliminated, as he would have fewest votes. And then this person’s vote would be transferred to Mamdani.
We can see from hypothetical election result that about 37% of people who ranked Lander are also Ranking Cuomo after him, and about 60% are ranking Mamdani after Lander, and about 3% are ranking neither of those alternatives. There’s a bit of ambiguity from the way these results are displayed, as you don’t have to rank people, and I would expect a lot of people just rank one candidate as #1 and leave the ballet blank.
Sounds like you have it figured out. As your top choice is eliminated in a round, your remaining top choice is used in successive rounds.
I only have one real concern about Mamdani’s mayorship.
You know damn well that the porks will be conspiring to sabotage his term. False flags to artificially increase the crime rate, porks hypocritically using union tactics to band together and go on strike to achieve their demands (mass layoffs, organized wage cuts, organized rent hikes) if not flat out sic the CIA on Mamdani.
Does anyone know how Mamdani plans to defend against the inevitable bourgeoise temper tantrum if he wins?
False flags to artificially increase the crime rate
I don’t think they will stage literal crime but I do think they will do what the right always does when they aren’t in power and that’s shining a unnecessarily bright light on existing crime that isn’t normally unusual and just overly report on it to give the perception that it’s happening more.
Does anyone know how Mamdani plans to defend against the inevitable bourgeoise temper tantrum if he wins?
You know the answer is no. Whenever a socdem wins an election, they do one of two things: either a neoliberal pivot after winning, or submit to local bourgeois sabotage until the public blames “progressives” and drives them out of office. Wielding power against the bourgeoisie is “authoritarian”, so the only choices left are to wield it against the working class or wait to be replaced by someone else who will.
Yup. Last time people were excited about a socdem mayor was Brandon Johnson and I’ll give you one guess about how that panned out
Zohran and Johnson are very different candidates with very different bases and experience
Does his experience or base change the fundamental power imbalance between an elected politician and the bourgeoisie state? Will he mobilize that base to fight his opposition when necessary? The work you’re putting in is admirable and I respect it
I think charitably, Zohran wants to engage a Red Vienna style policy in good faith. And that was a fairly successful position. But it’s hard to see how to do that without mass organisational support from the working classes.
I know what you’re saying, and this is by no means a revolution, but it is monumental progress towards removing the boot from the neck of the working class, should we win.
Generally, the idea here is make a democratic socialist mayoralty not just a one-off thing. We want to keep working class communities invested in community and political projects that actually work for us.
I know what the intention is, and I also know the forces arrayed against you that will undercut and hamstring every effort put forward. Best of luck, I sincerely hope you win
I mean I’d not blink if the ruling class tried to sink him in the election proper with a republican candidate, Corbyn style. Would be hard to do in NYC but they’d fucking try.
It’s gonna be a four person race bc if cuomo loses the dem nomination he’s gonna run under the self created fake party “fight and deliver” in the general so it would be Zohran-Adams-Cuomo-plus whoever the republican ends up being
I know the primaries use ranked choice voting but do the actual elections?
Nah just the primaries the election will be FPTP
I think something similar happened in San Francisco where the cops just refused to do their jobs because they were unhappy with the DA, and eventually he got recalled
Happened in Portland too
Porkland
: “Strikes are good as long as OUR class benefits!”
I can talk more about this if I do an in depth breakdown for sure, but in short it’s been something we’ve been aware of and planned for
If I were him, I would accept that I was at odds with the power structure, but rather than compromise or conform, i would just put everything on social media. Anything that can be justified as being made available for the public good in terms of trying to get things done, make these slimeballs fuck him over extremely publicly. Destroy the facade of democracy further.
That’s all there really is to do, imo, but he could probably get it done.
I keep banging this drum, but one bonus of a possible Mamdani win is seeing the NYT beg and plead for people to “pwetty pwease vote republican! Maybe finawwy the normals in Real AmericaTM will like us and see we’re not so bad!”
The Progressive Case for Curtis Sliwa