More dataisdepressing than dataisbeautiful

  • Cypher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Do u really want to be the one blaming 75% of suicides on men not being allowed to beat their wives?

    This is so back asswards it is genuinely astounding.

    Men are 75% of suicides under patriarchy.

    Damn I wonder how someone could conclude that patriarchy hurts the majority of men.

    • Men are 75% of suicides under patriarchy.

      Male suicide is getting worse every year the patriarchy is getting destroyed more every year, im simply pointing out the correlation is backward sof what u claim.

      Damn I wonder how someone could conclude that patriarchy hurts the majority of men.

      The data correlates exactly the wrong way for this to be true.

      • Cypher@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Correlation does not equal causation.

        I would point to the economic disparity that is widening in virtually every advanced economy as a much more relevant driver of male suicide.

        • Correlation does not equal causation.

          Exactly but causation does not come without correlation. Causation is a subset of correlation.

          I would point to the economic disparity that is widening in virtually every advanced economy as a much more relevant driver of male suicide.

          Economic disparity should be effecting the genders equally unless you are saying women are doing better financially.

          • Unquote0270@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Maybe do some research about statistical concepts before spouting what sounds good to you. Causation can absolutely ‘come’ without correlation.

            You are a great example of someone not understanding that things are complex so you reach for tabloid explanations because they are comfortable and simple.

            • Maybe do some research about statistical concepts before spouting what sounds good to you. Causation can absolutely ‘come’ without correlation.

              Name a counter example

              You are a great example of someone not understanding that things are complex so you reach for tabloid explanations because they are comfortable and simple.

              I refuse to engage in bad faith argument and school yard insults.

              • Unquote0270@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Name a counter example

                Statistics isn’t defined by examples. Educate yourself, this is a very well known and understood concept. Staying in ignorance is your choice.

                  • Unquote0270@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    I don’t need to prove you wrong with examples, you are wrong, it’s very well documented and widely understood. If you choose to not believe it and can’t be bothered to research it yourself then you have chosen to stay ignorant, and wrong, which is your right.