A new poll suggests that Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein is drawing more voters from former President Donald Trump than from Vice President Kamala Harris.

According to a Noble Predictive Insights survey released last week, Harris holds a narrow lead over Trump in a hypothetical three-way race. With Stein on the ballot, Harris’ lead expands, pointing to a potential spoiler effect similar to what many Democrats blamed Stein for doing to Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.

For Trump, the emergence of Stein as a potential spoiler may be a critical factor in battleground states, where even a small shift in votes could determine the outcome. For Harris, Stein’s candidacy could paradoxically provide an unexpected advantage, drawing votes from Trump and narrowing his pathway to victory.

  • Naryn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    People are allowed to stand for election without engaging in your idiotic 2 party system

    • Ledivin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      You’re allowed to do whatever you want, I just want you to understand that you’re choosing to literally do nothing 🤷‍♂️ you’re not making a stand, you’re not sending a message, and you’re not enacting change. You’re voting for Donald Trump while making yourself feel like you’re fighting an ideological battle.

      • Naryn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m not even fucking American 😂. I just believe that people have the right to stand and vote for a legitimate candidate.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          There is no legitimate third-party candidate in a first past the post system.

          • Naryn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Of course they are

            Not being likely to win doesn’t make them illegitimate.

            The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

            • Ledivin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              The UK is a FPTP system with 7.5 significant parties

              … I’m not sure how to break this to you, but the UK is a monarchy and has literally never elected their leader.

              FPTP isn’t nearly as problematic in a system with distributed representation like Parliament, the Senate, or the House. It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

              • Naryn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                It is massively problematic when electing a singular leader.

                No, it’s not. That’s how all of the elections you just listed work. That’s how first past the post works.