The personnel halting and stimulation response rifle (PHASR) is a prototype non-lethal laser dazzler developed by the US Department of Defense.

Its purpose is to temporarily disorient and blind a target.

Blinding laser weapons have been tested in the past, but were banned under the 1995 UN Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons, which the United States acceded to on 21 January 2009. The PHASR rifle, a low-intensity laser, is not prohibited under this regulation, as the blinding effect is intended to be temporary. It also uses a two-wavelength laser

  • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Its purpose is to temporarily disorient and blind a target.

    I can do the same thing with a laser pointer toy bought for $0.99 at a 99 Cent Store. And it even fits in a pocket without looking like a plasma cannon from Halo.

    • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would imagine this one has a laser that spreads out into a cone so that the operator can point it at a larger area.

        • Followupquestion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The newest “big thing” in the flashlight world is LEP, literally lasers used as flashlights. For IR, VCSEL is the current best, but only because that technology gets around FDA rules somehow.

    • FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The National Institute of Justice recently awarded ScorpWorks $250,000 to make an advanced prototype that will add an eye-safe laser range finder into PHaSR. Systems such as PHaSR have historically been too powerful at close ranges and ineffective but eye-safe at long ranges. The next prototype is planned to include the addition of the eye-safe range finder and is planned for completion in March 2006.

      Based on the article from Defense Review and the drop off of serious articles discussing it I’m guessing that the range difficulties made this unreasonable for police applications.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’m glad they’re not effective for riot control. Using these types of weapons against civilians is dystopian.

        • w2tpmf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Using these types of weapons against civilians is dystopian.

          Tear gas, batons, fire hoses, pepper balls, and shotguns with bean bags are all still ok though, right?