• Sanctus@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I’m not arguing with you about city laws regarding keeping wild animals as pets. Its dangerous and requires special permits for a reason and it has more to do with protecting the animals than you think.

    Edit: and whose to say the person that shot the squirrel did it for fun? What if they have deep regrets? Can you prove he was killed for fun?

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Nobody shot the squirrel. It was taken away and euthanized to check for rabies. Which is kind of dumb, since not a single case of rabies ever has come from a squirrel in the US.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I dont support that but OK. Permits exist to protect animals from people but go off and accuse me. Remember, regulations are written in blood. Love how my comment gets removed for not being civil but its chill for you to call me an animal abuser lmao