• HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    10 days ago

    Last I saw something like 55% of the populace looks like it voted for trump. In these crazy pants times I do not see bernie winning.

    • Arcturus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      What no political theory does to a mfer

      Trump offers a fake anti-establishment for people who are rightfully mad at the state. Only a working class party can direct that towards actual improvement.

      Problem is obviously that a working class party wouldn’t be funded and backed by billionaire capitalists the way the duopoly is; that’s the point of liberal “democracies” — keeping capitalist parties in power.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 days ago

      I’m not impressed by this analysis.

      • It doesn’t account for those who stayed home.
      • It doesn’t account those who would have voted for Sanders instead of Trump if that option were actually available to them.
      • Who did they think would be excited to volunteer to canvass for Democratic genocidaires? The DNC knowingly forfeited their ground game.
      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        I really cannot see how anyone who would vote for trump would vote for sanders. its like apples and poison ivy. I don’t get those who don’t vote in a democracy either. I hate living in this eroding time period but way the hell glad to be living when democracy is considered the standard form of government. On tope of it we get to vote for the office, and get to vote for people to run for the office, and can sign signatures to get people on the ballot to run for office. I feel like people really don’t have a good sense of human history.

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            10 days ago

            Yeah I just don’t see it. They could not be more different to me. I have no idea what measure these people are using that they would flip between those two. so I get they exist but its so outside my perspective I can’t grok the individual who is like that. Its like flat earthers for me.

            • davel@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              ·
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              They couldn’t be more different to me, either, but what we think is irrelevant. Whatever their reasons, and no matter how alien those reasons might be to you and me, significant numbers of people really did flip.

            • Farvana@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              10 days ago

              Bernie would raise wages, Trump will give tax cuts. The promise is that people will have more than the minimum. Biden/Harris were telling everyone the economy is great when we all knew it wasn’t and we’re all worse off than we were 4 yeats ago.

              Look at the material circumstances.

              (Just… set aside that Trump’s tax cuts mostly go to the rich. It’s the narrative that sways voters more than the reality.)

              • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                I mean it was doing well vs what was given to them. Its still flabbergasts me the comments of trump for the economy and that biden caused inflation. Inflation started being unusually high in april 2021 and biden took office in january. He did not cause the inflation from 3 months as president. I mean if our system of government needs to run on narratives and not actual truth then I guess trump is the least of our problems.

                • Farvana@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  The inflation stemmed from pandemic-justified price gouging on groceries and private equity purchases of rental properties. Government absolutely could have addressed this- even just continuing pandemic level food stamps would have helped immensely, but Biden ended it.

                  Biden pushed to take money and support away from people so he could declare the pandemic was over.

                  That’s truth. Recognize it.

                  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    No its not. Interest rates do effect inflation and they are supposed to be lowered due to economic pressures but trump brought them to zero after obama got them back to 3 or 4 percent and he did this before covid. Thus when covid hit lowering rates was not something else they could do. continuing food stamps would help people but would certainly have increased inflation. Now given that interest rates are not the only reason and price gouging was certainly part of it and possibly the major part. They did take action on that though by going after the gouging which is action that tames inflation rather than exacerbates it. He could not have made better moves in realtion to inflation while trump could not have made worse ones.

            • Chuymatt@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 days ago

              Um. I have seen it and they are just antiestablishment. Period. No other guiding light than that.

    • Orbituary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      You are not intelligent or informed. 20% voted him in. 55% of the people who voted comes out to about 40% of the eligible voters nationally.

      • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 days ago

        Going passed the disinformation in your first line. The people who vote are all that matter in a democracy. The others are basically dependent on their decision making regardless of if its because they can’t or won’t.

          • Orbituary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 days ago

            By design. Voting day is not a holiday and on a work day. Poor and working class are disenfranchised as a result. Fewer turn out because it’s not worth skipping work to stand in voting lines for hours.

        • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 days ago

          You are not intelligent or informed.

          Going passed the disinformation in your first line.

          lmao “It’s disinformation when someone calls me unintelligent and uninformed”. What happened, did you get tired of people telling you “that’s not what ad hominem means” and reach for the next rhetorical pejorative that crossed your mind?

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Are you justifying insulting folks in online debate? Do you think insults are appropriate to debate? This is a much simpler issue that does not even get to logic or reason as is dead on arrival once one gets that crass.

            • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 days ago

              I made no value judgements about insulting people (you don’t really need to specify “in online debate”), I was amused by the fact that you called it “disinformation” when it was just an insult and pointing out how silly it was.

              • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 days ago

                yeah the disinformation was me trying to be clever in my reply. yes it was clearly and insult but since it was one that was based on the idea that the replier has some knowledge about my level of intelligence or how well informed I am (although the statement made ironically usually implies an and when phrased that way) I decided to call it disinformation. IE its my way of saying I am well educated, score well on tests, and have a much broader knowledge set than at least most people I know and I have worked in academia and live in a major metropolitan area (note if you limit it to academia my knowledge set becomes significantly more average)

                • GarbageShootAlt2@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  It just makes you sound like a dweeb because “disinformation” is the dem-aligned version of “fake news”. I don’t have the slightest interest interest in your life story.

                  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 days ago

                    thats nice but now an insult once again rears its head in the discourse even if softened by making it somewhat in direct. Unfortunately I had to explain why I used the word when explaining why I used the word ever if you were uninterested. Its just a thing in discourse. Someone brings up a particular point and you assume they are interested in knowing the why around it.