• cmhe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I prefer OSMand over Organic Maps, because it has much more features, just the map renderer isn’t as pretty.

    But I mostly use it for pedestrian and bike navigation. But I think car navigation works very well as well.

    Also, if the map data isn’t so great in your region, you can try playing StreetComplete and help improve it yourself.

    OSM is the Wikipedia of map data, and offers likely the most detailed cards that we have.

    • colmear@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      For me the UI was just almost unusable. While the features are very nice and mostly unmatched, there is just no way to find them. Also it really killed the battery of my phone. While hiking it was fine, but for real time turn by turn navigations my phone died in about 2h compared to 4 or so on other apps

      • cmhe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, in that way it is a classic open source software, very powerful but a bit difficult to use.

        I rather have features I need hidden behind a cryptic interface, then not have them.

        I also normally carry around a power bank, and sometimes have to recharge my phone at lunch, when using it intensively. That seems just normal to me at this point.

        • colmear@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yeah, if you need those features. In my experience it’s often features only a very small fraction of people need that are cluttering the UI and make it impossible to find the features I actually need.