• tate@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I always forget that Windows Server even exists, because the name is so stupid. “windows” should mean “gui interface to os.”

    edit: fixed redundacy.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The GUI is optional these days, and there’s plenty of Windows servers that don’t use it. The recommended administration approach these days is PowerShell remoting, often over SSH now that Windows has a native SSH server bundled (based on OpenSSH).

      • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I’d say having a GUI is not inherently stupid. The stupid part is, if I understand it correctly, the GUI being a required component and the primary access method.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Yeah. Thankfully, Windows server cleaned up that stupidity starting around 2006 and finished in around 2018.

          Which all sounds fine until we meditate on the history that basically all other server operating systems have had efficient remote administration solutions since before 1995 (reasonable solutions existed before SSH, even).

          Windows was over 20 years late to adopt non-grapgical low latency (aka sane) options for remote administration.

          I think it’s a big part of the reason Windows doesn’t appear much on this chart.