Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareJo Miran@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-21 month agoI think what would give cavemen pause would be if the house was on fire for 20,000 years. That said, we definitely should have stayed on nuclear.
minus-squarekolonel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoDon’t know why you’re being down voted, that’s accurate. Dresden was set fucking alight like 80 years ago and was rebuilt. Chernobyl? And yes, it’s arguably cleaner than most fuel, just know what yours doing and don’t put it on a flood plane!
minus-squarethanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoTheir comment agitates both the “nuclear bad” crowd and the “nuclear good” crowd :(
minus-square☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoChernobyl shows that worst case scenario is that we get large wildlife preserves.
I think what would give cavemen pause would be if the house was on fire for 20,000 years.
That said, we definitely should have stayed on nuclear.
Don’t know why you’re being down voted, that’s accurate. Dresden was set fucking alight like 80 years ago and was rebuilt. Chernobyl?
And yes, it’s arguably cleaner than most fuel, just know what yours doing and don’t put it on a flood plane!
Their comment agitates both the “nuclear bad” crowd and the “nuclear good” crowd :(
Ahhh, I get ya.
Chernobyl shows that worst case scenario is that we get large wildlife preserves.