• z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Rockefeller did make attempts to make political work towards the latter part of his career. The hard part about being an artist/celebrity of any renown is that your audience becomes sort of like your golden fetters. You can’t change the content of your work less you alienate your fans. I admire Rockefeller to some degree for taking a chance to address civil rights in some of his works, but theres a lot of reasons why ultimately throse pieces fell short. Rockefeller’s audience at the time didn’t want him to step outside of his folksy genre he had pigeonholed himself into. Its the equivalent to “I just wanted to watch my football and drink my beer man, why you’d have to bring up politics. I get enough of that elsewhere.”

    Additionally, in the case of illustration, sometimes your art style just limits the kinds of messages you can say effectively. Rockefeller was an illustrator whose style emphasized and romanticized sweet scenes like from a movie. There’s a reason Disney’s artists take so much inspiration from specific artists and illustrators with a certain romantic flair. Take a look at the sickeningly sweet pastel portrayals of the Victorian bourgeoisie from Fragonard, and imagine that style attempting to address political injustices at that time. It just doesn’t work. Not unless you completely overhaul your style and the way you communicate visually can you convey the message effectively.

    Rockefeller tried to use his talents to address the civil injustices of his time, but due to the preconceptions he had built up over he years around the kinds of messages that work could convey, he ultimately was unable to convey it as effectively as other artists at the time would be able to.

    It may not be a fair comparison to make, but the works of [Barbara Jones-Hogu](https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Barbara+Jones-Hogu&iax=images&ia=images] were far more effective illustrative pieces that conveyed the sociopolitical sentiments of the time, partially because she was not pinned down by the limitations of what her previous works conveyed.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Uh… What? Have we been responding to an AI or something? You wrote quite a bit in both comments, but also referred to Rockwell as Rockefeller. Multiple times… But you also edited your comment? I’m so confused…

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Lol. Wow. I hnwstly don’t know how I could have made that many mistakes. My apologies, I am quite sleep deprived. But you can think I’m an AI if you’d like. People confuse my propensity towards overly verbose replies as being AI. Or, yknow, just don’t like it. I edit a lot because I make a lot of typos and catch them later. Thanks for pointing that out. Edited and done.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Thanks for replying! I edit almost every comment for clarification, typos, etc so I don’t fault you for that. I was just confused because every time, you wrote “Rockefeller” lol. Anyway, I hope you get some sleep and are practicing self-care…

          • Sergio@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 hours ago

            A different person here. FWIW I sometimes get texts and email from a friend that are extremely long and detailed and I was like WTF, I woulda assumed he’s an AI if I didn’t know the guy in person. Then one day we were hanging and I saw him reply to a text, and turns out he was speaking his replies and using speech recognition.