• Delphia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I dont think they made it worse… the first one does look a bit dated and in need of a refresh, but I dont think what they did was the answer either.

  • ebits21@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I like the after more. 🤷🏻‍♂️

    Edit: I do not like the new look for 500k more though. Double the purchase price!

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    They took out a tree that had a few generations of growth with a decision that only took a moment. And to make a worse looking landscape. The house is bad enough but they decided the landscape to be just grass is appalling.

  • OldFartPhil@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Better before. The brick gave the facade character. The “modernized” exterior is bland and weird.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Before definitely looks better. I think there’s some new design trend when selling a house to paint the exterior white. Not sure if it’s so the client can imagine their own color scheme or what, but I’m not a fan.