• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    8:58 they declare mayday because of no landing gear and two minutes later they’re attempting the riskiest landing of their lives? I bet „no landing gear” checklist is a bit longer than two minutes.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yeah unless they were out of fuel, isn’t the procedure to… Orbit and use nearly all fuel?

      • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        23 days ago

        If they had the bird strike like they announced, it might stop their engines mid go-around, what is really bad spot to be in

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          23 days ago

          Got it, I assumed the mentioned bird strike related specifically to the nosecone area and the front landing gear, but engine fidelity remained. Again, an assumption based on my first read

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          Interesting, can you elaborate? As in they don’t have power for a go around?

          • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            24 days ago

            By the time that they realized the landing gear failed, they were likely only a 300-800 meters off the ground. While its certainly not impossible to do a go-around on one engine in a 737, the pilots likely feared they wouldn’t have enough thrust, and they would be better off attempting to land without landing gear which the aircraft is certainly capable of doing. It’s also possible both engines were down, in which case they wouldn’t have had much of a choice.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      22 days ago

      8:58 they declare mayday because of no landing gear and two minutes later they’re attempting the riskiest landing of their lives? I bet „no landing gear” checklist is a bit longer than two minutes.

      You’re right, if the mayday were due to the landing gear not being down they wouldn’t have attempted to land so quickly. There are many things they would try first, and the final failsafe simply drops the landing gear with gravity. If the gear were up, it’s because the crew left the gear up.

      The mayday wasn’t about the landing gear.

      The mayday was due to a bird strike. They initiated a go-around after the bird strike, and they may have also lost the second engine during the go-around. Perhaps a second bird strike. This would explain the lack of flaps and landing gear: the crew may have been trying to minimize drag to reach the runway without power. Unfortunately they ran out of runway after floating too long due to ground effect and traveling far too quickly.

      The incident would likely have been survivable at many airports. That berm with the localizer antena on it is a terrible safety hazard that shouldn’t exist at a major airport.