Democrats support crime. Most criminals are democrats. Democrats have destroyed most police departments with their hostile action. Major cities can’t hire officers because of the democrats.
No cash bail? That’s the democrats.
Police work to reduce crime and it’s why I support funding the police and strong prison sentences.
Your first attempt at proving it failed spectacularly, so you’re just moving on to the next thing, which is rather disappointing.
It didn’t fail. It hit the mark. I can cite other things but you’ll continue to act in bad faith. You make things up then when asked to back up your claim. You hurl insults. When you are corrected, you hurl insults. So I’ll leave it at that.
“Majority of democrats pressure singular democrat over widely misunderstood phrase” equates to democrats celebrating murder? What a joke.
Pointing to a single democrat does not represent all democrats
The article itself states that she is in the minority position, even amongst democrats, further making her a bad representation of democrats on this issue
“Defund the police” is widely misunderstood as a phrase
Even if she literally meant “no police should exist” instead of the much more common meaning, that statement is not a celebration of crime or murder
you’ll continue to act in bad faith.
I came in here with an actual argument, that democrats are trying to reduce deaths, and you immediately called me an edge lord. If anyone is acting in bad faith here it is you.
You hurl insults. When you are corrected, you hurl insults. So I’ll leave it at that.
I havent insulted you. To quote a non insult, “You’re an edgelord. It’s what you are doing. You didn’t question a thing. You went full edge lord.”
Don’t want me saying these things? Maybe you should behave yourself. Don’t insult me and I won’t insult you. It’s not that hard winter.
Water isn’t wet in science. So yes. I’d expect them to cite misinformation.
https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/is-water-wet
Rest of what you said was babble.
Democrats support crime. Most criminals are democrats. Democrats have destroyed most police departments with their hostile action. Major cities can’t hire officers because of the democrats.
No cash bail? That’s the democrats.
Police work to reduce crime and it’s why I support funding the police and strong prison sentences.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/miss the forest for the trees
Your first attempt at proving it failed spectacularly, so you’re just moving on to the next thing, which is rather disappointing.
It didn’t fail. It hit the mark. I can cite other things but you’ll continue to act in bad faith. You make things up then when asked to back up your claim. You hurl insults. When you are corrected, you hurl insults. So I’ll leave it at that.
Then perhaps you didn’t read what I said:
“Majority of democrats pressure singular democrat over widely misunderstood phrase” equates to democrats celebrating murder? What a joke.
Pointing to a single democrat does not represent all democrats
The article itself states that she is in the minority position, even amongst democrats, further making her a bad representation of democrats on this issue
“Defund the police” is widely misunderstood as a phrase
Even if she literally meant “no police should exist” instead of the much more common meaning, that statement is not a celebration of crime or murder
I came in here with an actual argument, that democrats are trying to reduce deaths, and you immediately called me an edge lord. If anyone is acting in bad faith here it is you.
I havent insulted you. To quote a non insult, “You’re an edgelord. It’s what you are doing. You didn’t question a thing. You went full edge lord.”
Don’t want me saying these things? Maybe you should behave yourself. Don’t insult me and I won’t insult you. It’s not that hard winter.