Am I going to the lecture about AI in research or the one by a surgeon describing his experiences doing surgery with fishing wire and a drill he had to have a nurse collect at a hardware store, while doing international humanitarian work. 🤔
Why would they even double book this. What kind of turbo dork is going to the AI lecture which is probably identical to 60000 other AI lectures already given this year.
The worst part imo is that it’s supposedly for safety but female presenting people don’t need to have short hair. Which implies either that they don’t give a shit about women’s safety or that the job is more dangerous for male presenting people.
But the pay is good 
Which part is confusing you
Sadly I can’t, my job polices my hair (Your hair is not supposed to be grabable if you’re a dude). I have to live vicariously through you getting a mullet.
That would mollify my mullet-anxiety.
Not a mullet/10
Don’t look up the author of the three musketeers
Trans people have taken the will to power so far that they have decided to take charge of their own gender. That’s pretty ubermensch. Very Nietzchean.
Sadly that also makes them chuds. Trans people are cancelled now.
Four instructors have now successfully guessed where I’m from within a 10 mile radius and it’s like the first thing they said.
It goes something like:
Instructor: “And which structure is this?”
Me:(My guess)
Instructor: “Are you from (Name of the town next to where I’m from)”
My accent must be too heavy. I’m self doxxing whenever I open my mouth. I should get speech therapy.
That form of work they are obligated to do is to not be excommunicated. They are not charged rent.
And in either case, selling a convent off to a real estate developer isn’t some liberatory action, these women weren’t seizing property to put it into the commons or to redistribute it for the good of all, they were essentially claiming squatters rights to sell off a building to a real estate developer who was probably going to flip it. Which now that I’m saying it out loud isn’t really any worse than what the church was going to do with it.
The actual argument you could make here is that as the “workers” in the convent, they were entitled to the means of production (Production of… holiness I guess) i.e. the convent. The landlord/tenant relationship does not at all map on to a nun and the catholic church
I couldn’t agree more. Even if I know on some level it makes me a bit entitled. I just don’t see why I should give more “grace” to my judgement of a product that takes as long as a documentary to make by people who sometimes have more stable incomes and better connections than a lot of entry level documentary film-makers.
I haven’t looked up any details, but from what you tell me I too would side with the catholic church and Katy Perry, and saying those words wasn’t a pleasant experience.
There’s a bunch of 8 hour long recaps of various kid shows, and honestly I almost respect that. At least you’re putting in an honest 9-5 at that point, even if what you are making is slop.
I feel like given that video essays now have the turn around time of actual films, they should be judged by that standard. By which standards they’re all pretty bad.
Do you think they’d let me do a skullet if I said I was nonbinary. Is lying about being nonbinary to circumvent ridiculous gendered rules in the spirit of enbydom or stolen valour.