We live in a world of plenty where we still produce enough food that nobody need go hungry.
We live in a world of plenty where we still produce enough food that nobody need go hungry.
It does make me wonder about quantum suicide.
The lizardfolk brigade.
In 2016, 96% of UKIP membership voted for (some version of) Brexit - their raison d’etre. 4% is a typical fraction of any group to be chaotically bonkers.
And 51 feels prime. Someone sgould write a letter.
It’s “revelation,” singular. Like trivial pursuit.
It’s around one in two million.
The beeb. Interviewees were both pro-Israeli and representatives of different Palastinian groups; what could not be distinguished between them was the playground line of blaming the other for their own behaviour.
In the days following the October attacks, the media was filled with spokespeople repeatedly delivering the line, “look what they made us do”.
It comes to the same conclusion regarding the illegality of the weapons, even if it’s pretty lenient in its interpretation of how thousands of devices can be “reasonably expected” to all end up in the hands of combatants.
Are you saying that you’re in the tribe of people who are sick of identity politics?
The way the electoral roll is managed varies from place to place.
Avoiding automatic voter registration tends to favour the more traditionally conservative demographic; it’s racist and classist, but the people who turn up to vote on local electoral issues are too, by and large. It requires engagement to change.
You’ve linked into it, but I was just going to point at the Git book: https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2
It’s an afternoon’s reading; it does an excellent job of giving you the right mental model - and a crib aheet of commands to navigate it.
I have observed people taking Rust seriously. You need to reexamine your assumptions.
We have an evolved capability to short-circuit decisions with a rapid emotional evaluation. It means as a species we didn’t die out early [“that’s a lion; I’m a oerson; lions eat people ergo… Agh!” is not a sustainable strategy] - what’s amazing is that we can also apply it to elarned abstract things like an aestetic sense about programming languages. Such instincts aren’t always perfect, but they’re still worth paying attention to. I don’t see a reason not to express that in a blog post, but you can replace it with “this is unergonomic and in some cases imprecise” if you prefer.
That seems like quite a lot of booms.
FWIW I was trying to do something like this and ended up with pretty much what you describe - some custom shading to get everything working.
That seems like a non sequiteur. Did you watch the video? Did you hear what the presenter was asking for? Technical feedback on the API semantics they were describing. A heads-up if breaking changes to those APIs were about to land, so they can update bindings. They were bending over backwards to be accommodating. None of this is the entitled behaviour you describe.
That was my, admittedly bitter, point, yes. You do have to wonder what the hell weretcollectively playing at.